I must to say you have good point
1.
For a long time now manzakura, taruhei and miranai have been using it for videos without any problems
I personally don't visit IV DDL thread anymore, are these three poster working together, i mean, do they not repost from each others videos?
2. I was and still am from the few who want to this guys to have EU status. Why? take these three users off the forum and what we will get, almost nothing (excluding the reposters)
I think it's time that minarai gets Exclusive uploader status.
also Manzakura and Taruhei deserve the title (personal opinion) :bingo:
exclusive uploader or not, they will be r***ing by stegosaurus :spit:
Support our OP
4.
we get many simultaneous posts, but few mirror posts after 7 days
there should be a time limit before delete the post, if the free links a dead; posting mirror and keeping their precious premium links
But can they ignore the double-posting rule too? That's very important to them.
the only doble post they did are the ryushare premium links, but they could upload to another premium hoster...
free links don't paid?
5.
I have seen every trick possible from the posters mentioned here to get their preferred links up: posting invalid files on free hosts, deleting their own free links, waiting 1 day and breaking their free link URLs
I know that this happened before from some video poster but i doubt that aikon delete his own links, mediafire links from his early post are still up , why he dont delete them or why nobody report them? im sure its just one mf fanboy is reporting the links.
I remember 0rochimaru as EU , few exclusive videos and many repost, but how many of this exclusive uploader did get rogue, one?
6.
not everyone cares about earn money through links (like Crowny, dar4u, guy...) and yes there are others who also have imouto/minisuka subscription but none of them upload almost every day like this two do.
---------
how is the term repost defined?
in my understanding it should mean taking something that someone else has posted and posting it again. it seems here (at AO) to mean the posting of the same material, regardless of where it was sourced. a while back, that was the point of contention. if the ISO of movie 'A' (from share for example) was posted in DDL and another member posted the same ISO from his personal collection, that used to be OK i thought.
last year response
The ICDV-30096 torrent was allowed because that was a user who bought the title (via desioner). Obviously a purchase overrides the 7-day rule.
Edit: and I now realize this one is a user purchase too, so it's fine.
now
Reposting is uploading material that has been posted before, regardless of where you sourced it.
it doesn't matter now where you sourced the material. If someone has posted it before then it's a repost. Although in the case of videos, "significantly different encodes" are not reposts - so you can post different versions of the same video (SD, HD, ISO, HQ, 30fps, 60fps etc.) and they don't count as reposts.
so you are saying is per example: I post a picture set in original condition jpg files, anyone can repost the same files as bmp or jpg but lower quality, without breaking this rule? as there are different file extension or file size/ as if were different encoding of videos.
posts at almost the same time are allowed . If the time difference is less than 5 minute
we should take a closer look to whoever post first, I've seen someone posting the preview picture without the links just "uploading..." message
few minutes later edited with links added.