How Daft Punk's bad english made the song Get Lucky a hit.

Javvee

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2013
714
1,628
93
Owen Pallett has a great article on Slate explaining why Daft Punk's and the song
" Get Lucky ", was such a huge success through the lenses of classic Western music theory.

daft-punk-get-lucky-puresang-festival-mix-612x612.jpg


It may be a little technical but, if you know a bit about music it's fascinating stuff.

This bit is not music theory but very interesting too:


bbsann6j2t23jpioj2u9.jpg



... let me draw your attention to the irresistible abuse of the word good:

"We're up all night for good fun" vs. "Remind me to spend some good time with you."

... First, this is a specifically Francophonic idiosyncrasy; native English speakers do not ask
their lovers to remind them to spend " good time " with them, nor do they identify " good fun "
as their motivation for staying up all night.

... Secondly, the weighting is all wrong.

Good is a word that needs to fall heavy, needs to be placed at the beginnings and endings of phrases.

Remember Sir Paul McCartney's placement of good in " Good Day, Sunshine "—always settling on heavy
syllables. " GOOD day SUNshine." " I'm looking GOOD, you know she's LOOKing fine."

Worlds away from its apostrophic weighting in " WE'RE up all night for good FUN."

20130413-dp-600x-1365866538.jpg


For Daft Punk and Phoenix, this little bit of language mangling works in their favor.

It sounds off-balance and playful and sexy, like a foreign exchange student who might be a little drunk.

As any European—foreign student or not, myself included—can tell you, this is all true.

The effect feels like being Kal-El and coming to Earth from Krypton. ( The Movie, Superman ).


Regards.
 
Last edited by a moderator: