[KIDM-748B] Natsuki 夏輝 - 無修正 ~ファイナル編~

Ishikawa

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
391
10,180
KIDM-748B Cover.jpg
KIDM-748B[720] Index.jpg
KIDM-748B[LQ] Index.jpg
KIDM-748B[1080] Index.jpg
Title: 無修正 ~ファイナル編~
Actress(es): 夏輝 Natsuki
Manufacturer: Kingdom
Label: Empress
Catalog Number: KIDM-748B
Release Date: 2017-10-20
Running Time: 243 minutes!
File Format: iso & mp4
iso File Size: 35.99GB
[LQ] Video Codec: H.264 CBR ±1500kb/s @ 853x480
[LQ] Audio Codec: aac @ 160kb/s
[LQ] File Size: 2.76GB
[720] Video Codec: H.264 CBR ±4400kb/s @ 1280x720
[720] Audio Codec: aac @ 160kb/s
[720] File Size: 8.01GB
[1080] Video Codec: H.264 CBR ±11000kb/s @ 1920x1080
[1080] Audio Codec: aac @ 160kb/s
[1080] File Size: 21.39GB
Seeding Time: 2 weeks (Strictly Enforced)

This release is brought to you by a kind akiba-online member.

The only thing that will help you download this faster is to donate to the seed box… it's really that simple.
 

Attachments

  • KIDM-748B.torrent
    636.2 KB · Views: 18,859

kukukudas

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
3
1
Thank you so much for sharing this. Do you also have a KIDM-742B (Oda Asuka)? I am willing to donate to the seed box.
 

desioner

Sustaining L.I.F.E.
Staff member
Super Moderator
Nov 22, 2006
4,878
50,766
Thank you so much for sharing this. Do you also have a KIDM-742B (Oda Asuka)? I am willing to donate to the seed box.
Seedbox donations and orders are 2 separate things… You can do both but donating to the seedbox will not get you any new content just faster downloads of the content that is posted. I would appreciate a donation to the seedbox before any more new orders as the masses continue to complain about speeds they have no right to complain about.
 

milro

Active Member
Aug 22, 2009
88
248
You are incorrect there is 1 seed and one only. Did you not read my post? I assume that 99% of you do not…
The only way to download faster is to donate to the seedbox. If you don't donate than you can only wait.
View attachment 1188754

Hi there.
First of all, thanks for the torrent. Checking the file sizes I can derive that all the mp4 clips are very high quality conversions...

As you probably know, almost none will accomplish to download completely this torrent in his lifetime without a seedbox....
Even if someone selects to download the smallest mp4, probably, with the current progress will take a month or so...

The thing is that the torrent protocol is by design made to be fast even with just one initial seed. All you have to do is to offer a single file, reasonably sized, to accomplish this.
So if for example the torrent includes only one of the mp4's, we would (probably) all see reasonable progress in our download queues in the following days and after a little while more seeds will fuel the download...
Now the effort is split between the monster sized iso and three mp4's. I am afraid, with just one seed, we will never going to get even a single mp4 complete...
 

kukukudas

New Member
Sep 18, 2010
3
1
Hi there.
First of all, thanks for the torrent. Checking the file sizes I can derive that all the mp4 clips are very high quality conversions...

As you probably know, almost none will accomplish to download completely this torrent in his lifetime without a seedbox....
Even if someone selects to download the smallest mp4, probably, with the current progress will take a month or so...

The thing is that the torrent protocol is by design made to be fast even with just one initial seed. All you have to do is to offer a single file, reasonably sized, to accomplish this.
So if for example the torrent includes only one of the mp4's, we would (probably) all see reasonable progress in our download queues in the following days and after a little while more seeds will fuel the download...
Now the effort is split between the monster sized iso and three mp4's. I am afraid, with just one seed, we will never going to get even a single mp4 complete...

Ture if the original seeder set the maximum sharing speed. However, I don't think it was set to the maximum. Maybe 1~2 kb per sec?
 
  • Like
Reactions: milro

R156R

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2007
397
495
^lol been saying that to Des since probably the first time I told him to buy content for us. But it all comes down to beggars can't be choosers
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ishikawa

Ishikawa

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
391
10,180
Hi there.
First of all, thanks for the torrent. Checking the file sizes I can derive that all the mp4 clips are very high quality conversions...
As you probably know, almost none will accomplish to download completely this torrent in his lifetime without a seedbox....
Even if someone selects to download the smallest mp4, probably, with the current progress will take a month or so...
The thing is that the torrent protocol is by design made to be fast even with just one initial seed. All you have to do is to offer a single file, reasonably sized, to accomplish this.
So if for example the torrent includes only one of the mp4's, we would (probably) all see reasonable progress in our download queues in the following days and after a little while more seeds will fuel the download...
Now the effort is split between the monster sized iso and three mp4's. I am afraid, with just one seed, we will never going to get even a single mp4 complete...
I appreciate you thanks. As you all know @desioner has always made the highest quality rips since he started. File sizes are good for the quality. The main reason this file set is so large is the duration. Did no one convert the minutes to hours, or bother to see the thumbnails? It's 4 hours long!
A month on a 1GB rip is a bit long but you seem to not understand that any file in the set can easily be deselected. Therefore the point that individual files will download faster is incorrect. If the speeds stay the same and the files are isolated it will take the same amount of time…
That is the point after all. You have time or money… & obviously the thousands of leeches downloading this and the others he's seeding have much more time than money. It's a shit point but it's true. If each of those leeches gave only $1 the seed box would be funded for the next year and not a single leech would be complaining about the speeds.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thoraxe6668

milro

Active Member
Aug 22, 2009
88
248
....
A month on a 1GB rip is a bit long but you seem to not understand that any file in the set can easily be deselected. Therefore the point that individual files will download faster is incorrect. If the speeds stay the same and the files are isolated it will take the same amount of time…

Thanks for taking the time to reply on my post. Allow me to clarify the following in relation with the quote, above, from your reply...

Although I didn't included in my post, I know how to select a file in a torrent and, in fact, there lies the issue.
And the issue is everyone will select his or hers preferred file from the torrent, hoping that will at least download something as soon as possible, complete...
But while, let's say, I prefer the LQ mp4, others will go for the iso and others for one of the other two mp4's...
The initial and only seeder will have to split its bandwith and accomodate all the isolated file requests.
So, although everybody is downloading a single torrent, the peers that download the iso cannot contribute to the people that download the mp4's and the opposite.
That means the peers swarm is split in two or more isolated groups that cannot contribute to each other and if, for instance, the iso downloading group has more peers compared to the other groups then... "Houston, we have a problem"!

If someone knows better and thinks that the above are not correct, please step in.
I will read carefully his or hers answer but I will not reply.
That was all the time I had to spare and last but not least, this is also one of the strengths of the torrent protocol...
You set it once and forget it. It will work till the end of time trying to download your stuff!

Thanks again.
 

Mikko Makkonen

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
6
2
It is true that torrenting a single file at one time would be more efficient with limited bandwith. There would also be another positive outcome from this, namely that there are some torrent clients that don't handle the de-selection of files within a torrent correctly and take up disc space for the dummy files that will never be downloaded.

That's obviously a problem for someone who doesn't have free space readily available. And even if these users manage to download they might not be able to keep seeding the one file they downloaded because they can't reserve the extra disc space any longer. Therefore I would suggest starting with a single option and once that has enough seeds posting a torrent for a different quality file and then another one later and so on.

But as they say, beggars can't be choosers and we must appreciate every free gift we get. Thank you!
 

desioner

Sustaining L.I.F.E.
Staff member
Super Moderator
Nov 22, 2006
4,878
50,766
@Ishikawa I have a question. If one doesn’t mind getting this a little, say two months after people started downloading this, will it finish fast one starts it, say ... in a month from now or ...?
If you're specifically after the iso then it's gonna take a few days. The LQ, & the 720 are all on the seedbox and cranking away at 13MB/s. The 1080 is at 60% and will complete in a day. If you grab this now the seedbox will get you up to 50% of the complete set in a matter of minutes.
I thank all those that came out to support the seedbox. But please note that in another 6 months if it's not funded the process repeats… SUPER SLOW SPEEDS…
 

monkeychicken

Active Member
Feb 3, 2009
137
49
not that I'm complaining, but the 1080 is not flowing.
actually, for some reason the iso shows that it's 33gb, is that right?
 

novunovu

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2010
331
719
not that I'm complaining, but the 1080 is not flowing.
actually, for some reason the iso shows that it's 33gb, is that right?
It is not a mistake that ISO is 33 GB.
In my case, 1080 downloads ended about 2 hours ago.
Let's wait patiently.
 

R156R

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2007
397
495
Can I get some background info for this video? Did they forget to edit the sound or was this extended cuts of previous footage?