Mine is that depending on the story, the male actor is almost as important as the female actor for me to watch the JAV. There are 2-3 regular actors who just completely discourage me from enjoying a film.
Unpopular Opinion in JAV?
- Thread starter ToastFrench
- Start date
-
Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.
FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.
Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.
For more information see this thread.
My unpopular opinion is that this opinion is unpopular because not a lot of men are ready to admit they watch porn for big cocks and balls as well, not just for big tits, and asses. I think it's obvious, though: apart from IR porn (that almost always focuses on big members), there are dozens of sites that have some kind of a reference to big cocks in their name
(And those are much more likely to be for straight men, since if a person is bi or gay, then there are sites that might "tickle" them much better. And lately there have been at least a few more clearly curious sites like Watch Him Fuck etc. Basically, it's all a spectrum, nothing new about that...)
But that's narrowing your topic down. In general, I also agree that some actors, just as actresses, add to the scene and the movie just 'cause they give out the "well, even if he rams his cock down her throat, it's just 'cause the movie is about it; he seems like a good guy" vibes. And yeah, some actors are not that pleasant to have in a video. What came to my mind is the whole "old guy vs. young girl" sub-genre of JAV, where some of the actors seem to be intentionally gross. And I get that it's the whole point of such titles: beauty and the beast etc. But sometimes, that's just too much. But I understand that every fetish has its audience and that everyone's limits are different
Going back to my specific point about male genitals, I personally find that a bigger or at least average cock is almost always better for porn than a shorter one. We're watching a fantasy, right? (Of course, there are people who are in amateur, candid, etc. porn and want something to put themselves into the position of the actor, and then there are those who are into SPH etc.) In my fantasy, cute girls are put against big cocks, not small ones, because there is more "porn energy" in that. The phallic symbols are so popular (from India to Japan itself in religious monuments and symbols, to stuff like rockets) because we, even if subconsciously, associate them with life energy, strength, power, etc. Like, especially if it's a 孕ませ porn (focusing on making the girl "pregnant"), I think most, even if they won't admit it, would rather the actor to be hung since we associate it with higher fertilization chances. There is even a similar (semi?) scientific explanation to why straight (or should I say 95 or something percent straight, 5% curious?) men like she-male porn so much, and it also uses all this evolutionary fertility/competition for females logic
Yeah, as you can see, this is an interesting topic for me. In short, I agree that the actors involved, same as the actresses, thought to a somewhat lesser degree (since it's still straight, or let's say 95, 90% and so on straight in some cases, porn we're watching), can make or break a title. And I even think that if people had less hang-ups about "homo" stuff, we would have fewer heart attacks and so on. Maybe we all need to have some percentage of acceptance not just on the moral level, but on the sexual level as well, that yes, some cocks do look fine, though some are gross, same as some tits and asses, unfortunately, don't look so good. And that's OK
(And those are much more likely to be for straight men, since if a person is bi or gay, then there are sites that might "tickle" them much better. And lately there have been at least a few more clearly curious sites like Watch Him Fuck etc. Basically, it's all a spectrum, nothing new about that...)
But that's narrowing your topic down. In general, I also agree that some actors, just as actresses, add to the scene and the movie just 'cause they give out the "well, even if he rams his cock down her throat, it's just 'cause the movie is about it; he seems like a good guy" vibes. And yeah, some actors are not that pleasant to have in a video. What came to my mind is the whole "old guy vs. young girl" sub-genre of JAV, where some of the actors seem to be intentionally gross. And I get that it's the whole point of such titles: beauty and the beast etc. But sometimes, that's just too much. But I understand that every fetish has its audience and that everyone's limits are different
Going back to my specific point about male genitals, I personally find that a bigger or at least average cock is almost always better for porn than a shorter one. We're watching a fantasy, right? (Of course, there are people who are in amateur, candid, etc. porn and want something to put themselves into the position of the actor, and then there are those who are into SPH etc.) In my fantasy, cute girls are put against big cocks, not small ones, because there is more "porn energy" in that. The phallic symbols are so popular (from India to Japan itself in religious monuments and symbols, to stuff like rockets) because we, even if subconsciously, associate them with life energy, strength, power, etc. Like, especially if it's a 孕ませ porn (focusing on making the girl "pregnant"), I think most, even if they won't admit it, would rather the actor to be hung since we associate it with higher fertilization chances. There is even a similar (semi?) scientific explanation to why straight (or should I say 95 or something percent straight, 5% curious?) men like she-male porn so much, and it also uses all this evolutionary fertility/competition for females logic
Yeah, as you can see, this is an interesting topic for me. In short, I agree that the actors involved, same as the actresses, thought to a somewhat lesser degree (since it's still straight, or let's say 95, 90% and so on straight in some cases, porn we're watching), can make or break a title. And I even think that if people had less hang-ups about "homo" stuff, we would have fewer heart attacks and so on. Maybe we all need to have some percentage of acceptance not just on the moral level, but on the sexual level as well, that yes, some cocks do look fine, though some are gross, same as some tits and asses, unfortunately, don't look so good. And that's OK