Why hasn't Japan banned CP comics ?

ShogunXXX

Active Member
Nov 13, 2014
195
160
43
Akiba Islands
Code:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30698640
 
"There's every reason to be critical, that's fine," says manga translator and free-speech advocate Dan Kanemitsu. "But when you give people the authority to police others based on what they might do or what they think, that's thought-policing."

Manga is a little different than pure lolicon because a picture, by itself, is merely art but manga is also a written story. So I can see how that may be even more offensive to some people. Yet there is abasence of malice here and while I am not a very big fan of the genre it is clear to me that inducing crime against others is not the purpose of this medium.

The Japanese are a very industrial people The unemployment rate in Japan is 3.5% which is very effing good as far as that stat goes. The unemployment rate in the UK is at six year low at 6%. Who are they to critice what the Japanese read in their free time? What even gives them the right to poke their nose into this topic? That is for the Japanese to decide, on their own terms for their own reasons. Of course news "reporters" have to fill up space with some crap or other, however irresponsible and harmful their efforts end up being.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CoolKevin
"What even gives them the right to poke their nose into this topic ?" What right ? Same as what Westerners use for centuries to invade, destroy or simply critic other cultures and nations: imperialism (under its many forms).

Those assholes try to rescue computer generated images, meanwhile in UK :

Code:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10950111/The-alleged-paedophile-ring-at-the-heart-of-the-British-Establishment.html
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/dec/18/london-police-vip-child-sex-abuse-murder
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2884471/VIP-child-abuse-whistleblowers-murdered-MP-says-men-poised-lift-lid-scandal.html
 
you do not get it

it is about control, people are robots, it does not matter what they want, it is what we want to give them, and the system wants you to do what you are told to do, next is drugs in the water
 
Same as what Westerners use for centuries to invade, destroy or simply critic other cultures and nations: imperialism (under its many forms).


You really need to get over this idiotic crutch to support your hate bro. China and Japan both have done their share of invading (I even think Mongolia did its' fair share), so did the Persians, the Egyptians, the Turks, etc., etc., etc. All nations critic other nations and their cultures to a certain amount and they all have stupid tabloids and asinine reporters printing sensationalistic crap in order to make a dime.

My question was more rhetorical, I was not looking for an answer to it because the answer was obvious (at least to me). Though I have to agree with coolkevin that bottled water seems safer to drink and boil it before you cook with it. Keep in mind as well that control is part of any governments job (there are no exceptions in known histroy that I can think of) and it is what we hire them to do in the first place. We just don't want that whole control thing to get out of hand.
 
Fluorine isn't really a drug. On the other had it is happening, not because of some nefarious plot but because of the stupidity of the general population who flush their unused or expired drugs in the toilet. Which is something water sewage treatment plants can't handle so the drugs come out on the other side and reenters the water supply.


Do you realize that fluoridation is the most monstrously conceived and dangerous communist plot we have ever had to face?
Ooooh the old communist ghost... how scary :ngantuk:
 
[QUOTE="Elldallan,

Ooooh the old communist ghost... how scary :ngantuk:[/QUOTE]

No, the old Peter Sellers movie... how funny :cerutu:

[youtube=[MEDIA=youtube]Qr2bSL5VQgM[/MEDIA]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elldallan
No, the old Peter Sellers movie... how funny :cerutu:

Ooops my bad, carry on then.
It's been a while since I watched that one so I missed that reference.:apa: