(I don't mind adding it another thought to the topic) Ah yes, the word double standards. I'll show you why it's not a double standard.
If we started to have idol gay men on the site, what would happen? it's going to be an uproar because that's a negative thing.
the thing with [BOY] videos now it's appealing to gay men again (or bisexuals) it's softcore gay porn.
What about the U-15 girl videos? Sure that's a negative, of course to society right? However it's not for gay people at all, as gay hardcore or softcore porn will cause an uproar of unacceptance on the site.
So what is my point? My point is having gay soft core, underage is two things negative. U-15 girls is only one thing negative. Really if you put in into percentages let's give it 33.3% negative each.
33.3% = porn for gays (or bisexuals)
33.3% = gay underage soft core
33.% = u-15 girl videos.
equals to 100% of the negatively and opposition from society in general.
The only double standard only counts for 66.6% of the problem in terms of society I suppose and 33.3% in common as the double standard of underage soft core porn. The gay soft core porn is overall slightly more negative in terms of tolerance of the site. Ppl should stop throwing the word double standards, the only thing that is double standards is 33.3% of the negativity to society that it's under 15 videos. The rest is a step beyond the double standards those throwing out that term isn't acknowledging.
Of course I say this with all due respect and not to offend anyone. It's more than a double standards if you do the math. Ppl who doesn't agree is attracted to the 66.6% due to bisexuality which we now accept because alot of us after this thread didn't really insult them for it for those [BOY] threads now. However the votes speaks for themselves, a majority of the ppl really feels uncomfortable about it. 64.4% feels unconfortable and doesn't support it.
I find it slightly humours last time when there was a new [BOY] video then everyone who is homosexual or bisexual kept bumping those topics probally justifying it with the word double standard. I mean I have to totally click around it with effort since there is like six different threads or more now, no need to bump it all at once a week ago, even if your excited. Remember, double standards is only 33.3% the same in terms of underage. There is still the other negative how it's targetted towards bisexuals and homosexuals, considering male idols over 18 would cause an uproar of unacceptance, [boy] videos are only tolerated because it's underaged, the double standards as you say. If there was gay hardcore or softcore adult porn, it will not be tolerated here imo at all, there will be alot of opposition more than now.
Vote no because double standards isn't the full problem, it's only 33.3% of the problem in common, it's also gay soft core porn that only appeals to homosexuals and bisexuals, not heterosexuals. Like I said I mean no offense, we are opposing you, however silently, we tolerate it now no problem after discussing it here. We understand it now and I don't really mind if you label it appropriately. Peace out and remember not everyone is bisexual and will understand you, put yourselves in our shoes if you can, the part of your bisexuality where you like females only. Like I said I don't mind if you label it, just don't go justifying the word double standards not considering everything and I mean no offense because most of us doesn't mind it if it's labled since we can tolerate that, there is no need for a new forum for it. Peace and continue to vote no because things are working out well this way with no changes to the forum.
