The name of the actress is here https://www.arzon.jp/cast_79693.html Her "husband" Takeshi Shimoda, the is wife Reina Shimoda.
That was one hell of a find, Mr. Mago!
View attachment 643221
This "28-year-old" looks like she has the weight of the world upon her
The actress was uncredited in the reference sources I've checked... the only mention we have of the provided name was from JavLibrary. (When I put the raw Japanese into the translator, I got "The document ultimate year of the difference between husband and wife 37-year-old difference (a pseudonym) Takeshi Shimoda 65-year-old Reina 28-year-old.")
"Shimoda" has not been paired with "Reina," but with "Takeshi." I am wondering, did you get this name from a good source? More importantly, the name in the title may not be the name of the actress, but the name of the movie's character (as they put it, a "pseudonym.") There is a chance this actress could have an entirely different name (perhaps "Reina" is a match with her stage name), and it is possible she could have appeared in other movies.
.
Real Broadcaster - 10 Facial Blasts, 3 Shots of Cream Pie, Shocking Liberation - One-Time Only Semen Disgrace of a New Intelligent Hot Announcer Having Both Brains and Good Looks [RCT-597]
And the name of the lady is...
Tsubasa Mizuse
View attachment 519759
(A.K.A. Tsubasa Minase)
.
The search changed a few days ago, now you have to use JS006 instead of JS-006..
Hi, Mr. Mago... it's hard for me to use Arzon, with the language barrier (DMM is different, I'm kind of used to it by now; I'm getting used to Minnano-AV, too), but if you give the site high marks, maybe I'll start checking its information more. (Doesn't look like we can search via DVD codes, unfortunately.)
I'm still not sure of "Reina Shimoda," now that you've written "Takeshi Shimoda" is the name of the movie's husband. JAV reference sites have been known to take the name of "character names" from titles, for use as the actual actress name.
Hello Guyverzero; we can never be sure what is real and what is fake in porn, but JAV has a tendency to brag about featuring women from regular walks of life. Sometimes I believe they don't always lie. I can imagine in at least some of these "real announcer" movies the women could easily have been involved in news broadcasting. (But... which actresses.)
.
.
Rina Nishihara sure is a fresh-faced beauty. Her two movies were released a year ago... doesn't look good, but who knows; she may resurface again.
I wish this cute whore had done more than one movie. Good on her for her only release being a bukkake one though!
View attachment 643774
I think you are right. Still, I wish she had stuck around longer....how about MIGD-432 and YKL-007, JAV Library put those movies under her name, are they different girl ?
View attachment 643832
If you look up "whore" in any dictionary, I am pretty sure it will say something about a woman who is being paid for sex. I am only using the word most relevant to the situation..
"I wish this cute whore had done more than one movie. Good on her for her only release being a bukkake one though!"
It would appear Haruka Kitagawa has appeared in at least two other JAVs released in July-August of 2012. She is quite attractive; her other starring role (MIGD-432, pictured below) also claimed she was a real TV reporter... making me wonder if there may have been some truth to that claim.
View attachment 643833
I wish you would not use the demeaning word "whore," Samurai79; I cringed the first time you had done that. I don't think the warrior class you come from, priding themselves on a tradition of honor, would approve.
If anyone thinks, well, both get paid for sex so what is the difference, you will find at least the California Supreme Court disagreeing with you.
Randazza explained that the differentiation between pornography and prostitution generally refers back to a 1988 California Supreme Court case, People v Freeman. The Freeman decision basically found that although porn performers are ostensibly paid to have sex, they really aren't; first, they are paid for appearing in a film.
Another basic tenet Freeman established is the direction of payment. Porn stars aren't doing prostitution, according to the California Supreme Court, because they are paid by a third party rather than by the person they are having sex with. OK, so then wouldn't that cover garden-variety pimps and madams? Well, no.
Apparently, professionalism plays a big role in the legal differentiation between paying for sex and paying for the chance to have sex on camera.
.
If you look up "whore" in any dictionary, I am pretty sure it will say something about a woman who is being paid for sex. I am only using the word most relevant to the situation.
Well, I disagree with you both. Oh well.I think you not carefully read Mr Jugulear's post above
and I agree with him, porn performers does not same with whore
Having lived in Japan for well over a decade, I can tell you....the girls doing porn in Japan are whores. They are doing it for the sole aim of making money, not because they want to be "actresses"!I think you not carefully read Mr Jugulear's post above
and I agree with him, porn performers does not same with whore
Having lived in Japan for well over a decade, I can tell you....the girls doing porn in Japan are whores. They are doing it for the sole aim of making money, not because they want to be "actresses"!