.
(SOLVED)
This one may prove to be a really tough one, given that the lady is not a featured player; frankly, I don't even know why I found her to be fascinating. From some angles, she appeared strangely sexy. Others, particularly when she smiles, she kind of resembles a monkey. (Boy, that is cruel; but I'm just calling 'er as I see 'er.)
Yep, there are those times when she looks pretty strange:
See what I mean?
She is the "second-in-command," a kind of lieutenant to the movie's tormentor, played by Uta Kohaku, in a non-sexual role. (That is, Uta is not sexual. Come to think of it, neither is our mystery maiden. Such a disappointing outcome is precisely the reason why I sometimes consider asking for my money back... but the problem is, I didn't pay to see the movie.)
Yep, she doesn't even show one boob. So why did I even care?
Could it be because I felt cheated? I mean, come on, not even a boob, for melon's sake? (If I may psychoanalyze myself, which is one of my favorite hobbies... could it be, maybe subconsciously, if I learned who she was, one day I could see one of her boobs? Have I sunk this low?)
See, there are times she looks pretty nifty. As with the profile shot above.
Below, very nice. Making up for the times when she isn't really all that special-looking. But let's not hold that against her, not all women look equally wonderful from every angle. Sophia Loren, for example, would go out of her way to avoid showing her profile in the movies she appeared in. Do you think that may be a clue? Is it possible this lady is related to Ms. Loren?
Well, thanks. Maybe one of the geniuses around here will have an idea as to whom this offbeat starlet may be.
.
(SOLVED)
This one may prove to be a really tough one, given that the lady is not a featured player; frankly, I don't even know why I found her to be fascinating. From some angles, she appeared strangely sexy. Others, particularly when she smiles, she kind of resembles a monkey. (Boy, that is cruel; but I'm just calling 'er as I see 'er.)
Yep, there are those times when she looks pretty strange:
See what I mean?
She is the "second-in-command," a kind of lieutenant to the movie's tormentor, played by Uta Kohaku, in a non-sexual role. (That is, Uta is not sexual. Come to think of it, neither is our mystery maiden. Such a disappointing outcome is precisely the reason why I sometimes consider asking for my money back... but the problem is, I didn't pay to see the movie.)
Yep, she doesn't even show one boob. So why did I even care?
Could it be because I felt cheated? I mean, come on, not even a boob, for melon's sake? (If I may psychoanalyze myself, which is one of my favorite hobbies... could it be, maybe subconsciously, if I learned who she was, one day I could see one of her boobs? Have I sunk this low?)
See, there are times she looks pretty nifty. As with the profile shot above.
Below, very nice. Making up for the times when she isn't really all that special-looking. But let's not hold that against her, not all women look equally wonderful from every angle. Sophia Loren, for example, would go out of her way to avoid showing her profile in the movies she appeared in. Do you think that may be a clue? Is it possible this lady is related to Ms. Loren?
Well, thanks. Maybe one of the geniuses around here will have an idea as to whom this offbeat starlet may be.
.
Last edited:
I'm not exactly sure, especially since RCT-596 is from 2014 and the works of the girl whom I found are fairly recent. Anyway, I saw this girl on the back cover of NFDM-436. Top right corner, second from the left, and thought that she looked just like the one you've been looking for.
