.
Announcer Gang-Banged Under Threat of Having Her Job Offer Revoked, A Tearful Report [SHKD-625], with Minami Natsuki
So what's going on?
Yeah! I watched this one last night, and the other girl is in practically every scene! Her feet and legs are even there in the closeups of Minami's naked (and irresistable) body on the floor. So
I kept waiting for her to do something to Minami besides take video and photos and talk at her!
Watching without sound or translation, I assumed she was an old friend who for some reason had turned on Minami and was blackmailing her for something. Knowing more of the actual story now, I still ask why didn't the director throw in a girl-on-girl scene? It seems like such an easy fit with the storyline for the girl to do it for the personal
humiliation, or maybe as an expression her
envy of Minami, or even to show she's an unstable, manipulative, predatory crazybitch!
Looking at it another way, how much did it cost the producers to pay the clothed actress to be in practically every scene? How much would a lesbian scene have added to that total? In American porn we've come to expect that any female actress will do anything at any time with another female. In the industry, it always provided cheap filler--
cheap because you could otherwise burn a lot of time and film waiting for a guy to get his equipment up and in and off.
So why isn't it that way in JAV? Is the Japanese audience for girl-on-girl that separate, that compartmentalized from regular hetero-porn watchers? Or does it attach some special stigma to female actresses, either from their fans or their boyfriend/husband? (I remember reading about certain American porn actresses in the 1970s or 80s who never had a sex scene with a black actor for fear of losing fans or angering the man in their life.) Culturally or economically, there's gotta be a reason.