I ran across a torrent site and found some censored movies able to be de-pixelated, not 100% but 90% good. Do you know what the technique being used? I have some favorite JAV movies that I would love to be able watch at 90% de-pixelation.
How is censored movie being de-pixelated?
- Thread starter mycl500
- Start date
-
Akiba-Online is sponsored by FileJoker.
FileJoker is a required filehost for all new posts and content replies in the Direct Downloads subforums.
Failure to include FileJoker links for Direct Download posts will result in deletion of your posts or worse.
For more information see this thread.
I have yet to see a good image quality de-censored movie. On screenshots it might look fine and then, when you watch the video, it's just blured and it just gets weirder than watching it with original pixelisation. Not to mention the logo "Jav player" floating around.
Every censored/mosaiced region in the videos are the results of downsampling. The simplest form of downsampling you can think of is you mark a region. This region is filled with a grid of blocks. Each block is filled with the average color value of the corresponding block in the original frame/picture. There are also variants, e.g. with additional blurring.
This knowledge seems to be used for creating the JavPlayer. The JavPlayer is using the neural network/AI called TecoGAN. TecoGAN is designed to upscale/upsample videos without the usual artifacts of standard methods. So in one step the JavPlayer downsamples the censored regions and upsamples them again with TecoGAN. This "destroys" the censored regions.
There is a problem.
TecoGAN was never designed to "decensor" or "remove" the mosaiced regions. It was designed to upscale/upsample videos. Nothing more and nothing less. Using this technique is like using a hammer for a screw. Sometimes it works, but mostly it fails and something is broken. That's why you see tons of deformed body parts in these videos. Sometimes this software even removes the pussy. LOL.
The downsampling to create the mosaiced regions in the videos is an operator that destroys information. Therefore you need something that actually can "reconstruct" lost informations. One example would be something like this:
https://news.developer.nvidia.com/n...e-reconstructs-photos-with-realistic-results/
You can compare it with TecoGAN:
https://ge.in.tum.de/publications/2019-tecogan-chu/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.09393.pdf
You don't need to study computer science to see the difference. Looking at pictures / videos should be enough to understand what "reconstruction" and "upscaling" in the field of computer graphics / computer vision mean.
Using these neural networks/AIs also means you won't have a method to "reconstruct" the original uncensored movie. You really need a true uncensored leaked version of it. Such AIs can only "guess" how it looks like. A good example to understand this is the video on the nVidia page. You can actually see how the AI guesses the output. That also means the results of these neural networks/AIs will always be deepfakes. So the only hope here is to find a method to create "good" deepfakes, where you don't see the fake. The JavPlayer is far away from creating deepfakes which are actually "good".
Therefore, here is my advice. Don't waste any money for this shovelware and one of these deepfake videos.
The user GekkoE7 is currently posting lots of these deepfakes in the Uncensored Jav Downloads.
Example:
https://www.akiba-online.com/thread...wa-misa-love-toy-behind-closed-doors.1949601/
Look at 25:17. This is JAV 2.0 in its finest form. LOL.
This knowledge seems to be used for creating the JavPlayer. The JavPlayer is using the neural network/AI called TecoGAN. TecoGAN is designed to upscale/upsample videos without the usual artifacts of standard methods. So in one step the JavPlayer downsamples the censored regions and upsamples them again with TecoGAN. This "destroys" the censored regions.
There is a problem.
TecoGAN was never designed to "decensor" or "remove" the mosaiced regions. It was designed to upscale/upsample videos. Nothing more and nothing less. Using this technique is like using a hammer for a screw. Sometimes it works, but mostly it fails and something is broken. That's why you see tons of deformed body parts in these videos. Sometimes this software even removes the pussy. LOL.
The downsampling to create the mosaiced regions in the videos is an operator that destroys information. Therefore you need something that actually can "reconstruct" lost informations. One example would be something like this:
https://news.developer.nvidia.com/n...e-reconstructs-photos-with-realistic-results/
You can compare it with TecoGAN:
https://ge.in.tum.de/publications/2019-tecogan-chu/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.09393.pdf
You don't need to study computer science to see the difference. Looking at pictures / videos should be enough to understand what "reconstruction" and "upscaling" in the field of computer graphics / computer vision mean.
Using these neural networks/AIs also means you won't have a method to "reconstruct" the original uncensored movie. You really need a true uncensored leaked version of it. Such AIs can only "guess" how it looks like. A good example to understand this is the video on the nVidia page. You can actually see how the AI guesses the output. That also means the results of these neural networks/AIs will always be deepfakes. So the only hope here is to find a method to create "good" deepfakes, where you don't see the fake. The JavPlayer is far away from creating deepfakes which are actually "good".
Therefore, here is my advice. Don't waste any money for this shovelware and one of these deepfake videos.
The user GekkoE7 is currently posting lots of these deepfakes in the Uncensored Jav Downloads.
Example:
https://www.akiba-online.com/thread...wa-misa-love-toy-behind-closed-doors.1949601/
Look at 25:17. This is JAV 2.0 in its finest form. LOL.
Last edited:
This is why I'm not into decensored movies. Even if you're lucky and you get a watchable result, it's not the original movie, it's what some AI thinks is happening down there. You might as well use some deep fake software to paste in somebody elses pussy being fucked.
Now actual uncensored leaks I do like, because they're the real thing. Unfortunately these are still fairly uncommon and finding them on places like sukebei is a bit tricky because people also label the decensored videos as "leaks" for some reason. Luckily they do tend to add something like mosaic destruction in the title for those.
Now actual uncensored leaks I do like, because they're the real thing. Unfortunately these are still fairly uncommon and finding them on places like sukebei is a bit tricky because people also label the decensored videos as "leaks" for some reason. Luckily they do tend to add something like mosaic destruction in the title for those.
THIS !
maxjav tag those de-pixelated movies as "uncensored", so I always check the screenshot and see the ugly de-pixelated areas.
When these videos leave sukebei and are uploaded elsewhere the information that the quality of the video was reduced by a non-working software gets lost. In Western porn websites with a JAV section (the end of the chain) these videos usually are tagged as uncensored or uncensored leaked.
But it also seems these videos are replacing the censored versions too. Example:
https://www.akiba-online.com/threads/pgd-649-guramarasu_sekkusu-asa.1160242/#post-3410473
This video with Asami Ogawa is a JavPlayer version and there is no warning.
There were real uncensored leaked videos by Acky. And surprise! Someone created JavPlayer versions of other Acky videos and used the fact that people are searching for uncensored Acky videos. There were E-Body leaks and after that there were JavPlayer versions. This clearly shows what's going on there.
It is spam and should be treated as spam.
But it also seems these videos are replacing the censored versions too. Example:
https://www.akiba-online.com/threads/pgd-649-guramarasu_sekkusu-asa.1160242/#post-3410473
This video with Asami Ogawa is a JavPlayer version and there is no warning.
There were real uncensored leaked videos by Acky. And surprise! Someone created JavPlayer versions of other Acky videos and used the fact that people are searching for uncensored Acky videos. There were E-Body leaks and after that there were JavPlayer versions. This clearly shows what's going on there.
It is spam and should be treated as spam.
Well, it's doing what we're doing, using our imagination to guess what's under this mess of pixels. XD
Except it's a robot's imagination, poor poor poor robot.
*Somewhere, in some kind of electric bar where AIs have electric beers after a hard nanosecond of work*
"ROUGH DAY. I AM USED TO RECONSTRUCT FACIAL DETAIL ON SECURITY CAMERA FOR THE POLICE"
"I KEEP TYING THE GO WORLD CHAMPION I CAN'T GET A WIN"
"I TALK TO PEOPLE ON TWITTER AND THEY MADE ME A NAZI *INSERT IRONIC ANTISEMITISM*"
"I DECENSORED BUG VOMIT PORN TODAY"
And then everybody divided by 0
Except it's a robot's imagination, poor poor poor robot.
*Somewhere, in some kind of electric bar where AIs have electric beers after a hard nanosecond of work*
"ROUGH DAY. I AM USED TO RECONSTRUCT FACIAL DETAIL ON SECURITY CAMERA FOR THE POLICE"
"I KEEP TYING THE GO WORLD CHAMPION I CAN'T GET A WIN"
"I TALK TO PEOPLE ON TWITTER AND THEY MADE ME A NAZI *INSERT IRONIC ANTISEMITISM*"
"I DECENSORED BUG VOMIT PORN TODAY"
And then everybody divided by 0
Hate? No. I am actually amused by the whole nonsense.
It's like collecting Pokemon. I enjoy finding new lifeforms:
It's like collecting Pokemon. I enjoy finding new lifeforms:
I agree, I see no hate here. Actually NFN's explanation of the process is really good.The information that is lost in the pixelation is gone forever. Where we are today, technologically, computers can do an approximation of what was there, but no more. Sometimes it's close, sometimes it's way off. I suppose you could train an AI with uncensored material showing the genitals of a certain starlet so it can make an even better guess in her case, but it will always be an approximation. That's just the reality of it.
You cant be serious? No hate?
The javplayer author is a real person and yet people called his shit shovelware and spam. You cant really insult a dev more than that. This exact nonsense drives any real devs away.
You just call his work shit yourself just now. 
There is hate out there but it isn't a hate of anyone's work, I think it is a hate of sites billing things as uncensored when it decensored, and sometimes not very well. Even really "good" jobs still have a fuzziness. I'm like others and just ignore them.
There is hate out there but it isn't a hate of anyone's work, I think it is a hate of sites billing things as uncensored when it decensored, and sometimes not very well. Even really "good" jobs still have a fuzziness. I'm like others and just ignore them.
Well, I'm not going to go too far into this, emotions seem to be running high in a few threads. What I do see is polarization, i.e. some people proclaiming decensoring is the next step in mankind's evolutions, other calling it shovelware (which is not that bad of an insult imho). Pose any opinion and be ready for somebody to disagree vehemently, that's the internet for ya. Personally I say "whatever floats your boat, go with it and don't pay to much attention to opposing opinions".
And, as was mentioned elsewhere, albeit worded differently, all this banter is about jacking off, so what's the big deal anyway?
And, as was mentioned elsewhere, albeit worded differently, all this banter is about jacking off, so what's the big deal anyway?
Last edited:
One addition: If anyone wants to take the moral high ground, let's also not forget the facts: Copyrighted material is being re-worked here, I wonder how the studios, actors and distributors feel about all of this. Not that I'm any better, I leech plenty of pirated content myself, but just sayin', you know?
I agree decensored movies aren't bad as such, but what is bad is people pretending their decensored movies are leaked uncensored ones. Many people are interested in the one and not the other, because decensoring is far from perfect still. As long as it is clearly labeled I don't think anybody minds.
I gave a decensored movie a try to see how far the technology has gotten, and so far it is not good enough for me to want them. I'll keep on watching censored movies and give it another try in a few years when hopefully things have improved some more. Other people might think the current versions are already an improvement so they can download them. I don't dislike them for that, it's all a matter of taste and I don't blame people for liking other stuff than I do, that would be silly.
I gave a decensored movie a try to see how far the technology has gotten, and so far it is not good enough for me to want them. I'll keep on watching censored movies and give it another try in a few years when hopefully things have improved some more. Other people might think the current versions are already an improvement so they can download them. I don't dislike them for that, it's all a matter of taste and I don't blame people for liking other stuff than I do, that would be silly.