Congrats for creating a working program! To my mind, it's indeed a bit barebone, but my my... you don't need to apologize to anyone. You have a clear vision of your project, which is for a particular customer, and only that customer has any right to criticize you.
It's far more important to be very clear about the end goal and finishing it than to start a grandiose project for imaginary phantom customers but may never actually become a working program.
But having said that, don't you think your plain vanilla view is really too barebone? With over 4000 vids all you have is DVD code, with no sense of actress(es), title and year of publication. It seems not too hard to "borrow" the scrapper part of @LordPhantom 's project and adapt it to supply at least a little bit of useful info for your database.
Also the display format "hh:mm:ss AM" for Run Time seems a bit weird, why not just format it as "hh:mm"?
About a name, how about Friender? You can tell your trafficking feet it's a pet project.
It's far more important to be very clear about the end goal and finishing it than to start a grandiose project for imaginary phantom customers but may never actually become a working program.
But having said that, don't you think your plain vanilla view is really too barebone? With over 4000 vids all you have is DVD code, with no sense of actress(es), title and year of publication. It seems not too hard to "borrow" the scrapper part of @LordPhantom 's project and adapt it to supply at least a little bit of useful info for your database.
Also the display format "hh:mm:ss AM" for Run Time seems a bit weird, why not just format it as "hh:mm"?
About a name, how about Friender? You can tell your trafficking feet it's a pet project.