JKDD-011 JK×T Yuri Takahashi

Stooky Bill

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2015
384
345
Normally, I'd just buy this, because it sells really cheap, but I'm afraid it'd never make it past customs due to the age printed on the cover. However, I don't believe that's her real age, given the apparent content and the 2014 release date (and it would NEVER sell that cheap if that was the real age). Fake ages have long been a "selling point." It's on youiv, which puts watermarks all over videos, but that'd be better than nothing.
 

Death Metal

Burning Knuckle
Jan 9, 2007
678
1,002
I checked on YouIV and it's 100,000 points expensive, so it's not worth getting it from there, I think. And their picture quality is usually atrocious, on top of the watermarks. The file is more than 2 GB large, that's ridiculous for a DVD rip with shit deinterlacing, like they do. You're better off buying the actual thing if you hope to see it with any semblance of picture quality.

Some u18 DVDs still do sell that cheap because the demand for them is not high, or it might be second hand sometimes. I don't think that has anything to do with whether or not the age on the cover is real. Quite a few Honoka Kawai titles are still selling for lower than the original shelf price at Surugaya as well.
 

Stooky Bill

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2015
384
345
I mostly say the age is fake because of the rather low amount of clothing involved. That may have flown around 2007 with Yui Arioka, but this seems way too late.
 

lpcs1

Suffers from semenly incurable Narutophilia
Dec 7, 2012
639
623
I mostly say the age is fake because of the rather low amount of clothing involved. That may have flown around 2007 with Yui Arioka, but this seems way too late.
this just made me sad inside :')

..should we then extrapolate that Honoka Kawai is also NOT 16 years old in this?

613jx4sG1wL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg

b1059392522.1.jpg
 

Stooky Bill

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2015
384
345
No, because the amount of clothing she's wearing in it was "appropriate" for idols of that age at the time, and based on her age around that time period, her appearance in that underground porno video dates to her being 18.
 

lpcs1

Suffers from semenly incurable Narutophilia
Dec 7, 2012
639
623
just to make sure I understand you correctly, based on your knowledge Honoka Kawai is indeed 16yo in JKDD-005 but Yuri Takahashi is likely not 17yo in JKDD-011 ?
 

Stooky Bill

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2015
384
345
I'm just guessing based on the stricter guidelines they imposed on U-18 idols following that Shinkosha incident in 2007 that they wouldn't allow a U-18 idol to be fully nude as the cover implies (though that could be a camera trick), plus she looks older than 17 to me.