Those versions are only for those who can't run the normal version. They give no 64-bit advantage whatsoever and are known to be less stable for those who don't need them. They use less stable versions of multithreaded Avisynth that seem to play nicer with 64-bit Win 7.tried the x64 versions, A and B, out of interest
What was the error, and when did it occur?I had a different rip produce a Visual C+++ error with the same application.
The the multithreading crash in avisynth described above has a "Visual C++ ...." title but indicates the problem is in mencoder.exe. It is different to the other problems I've recently been solving, so the text of the error is important.Sorry, didn't save the error -- but it was a generic error with little info
Do you mean the 1.4 version? That's the one I was interested in testing...Again the original 1.3 app will not play on my 64-bit machine
----[NoImage] TemporalSoften: Scenechange not available on RGB32
----[NoImage] (QuickTGMC.avsi, line 357)
----[NoImage] (C:\MSOCache\EnC\test-xvid.avi.avs, line 6)
---[NoImage] Exception message
----[NoImage] nnedi2: only YV12, YUY2, and RGB24 input are supported!
----[NoImage] (QuickTGMC.avsi, line 352)
----[NoImage] (C:\MSOCache\EnC\test-xvid.avi.avs, line 6)
-AO@Help-
Your source video in in RGB32 format, which isn't supported in some of the QuickTGMC plugins. I've updated the batch files & templates in the original rerip post to get round this. Please download the new batch files/templates and try again. Post any follow ups in that thread.I'm having some difficulties
Version B starts working but has indicated that my 1 hr video will be 11GB in size, so I have terminated the rip.
The first video job is the TGMC deinterlacing script getting encoded to a lossless .AVI file with mencoder.exe. The second video job is a 1-pass x264.exe encode of the lossless .AVI file.
When I select 900MB file size I then get an error saying that I do not have the TIVTC.dll in my AviSynth Tools Plugin folder. I found a copy of TIVTC.dll on the net after a lot of hunting, added it to the folder, but it fails to open.
It's perfectly safe to have MeGUI, AviSynth, or anything else installed on your system. meguIV is completely isolated it it's own "Sandbox" folder, and does not interfere with your own existing software.
You can copy files out of (and into) the virtual sandbox with a little trick: open a file save dialog in meguIV and copy and paste files from physical folders (like your desktop) to virtual folders (like C:\meguIV). Or vice-versa.
The one-click encoder is very limited in what it will accept as input. That's one of the things I've been working on, to allow it to accept avi, mpg, d2v, m2ts etc. But it's tiresome work because the one-click code in MeGui is a hacky mess, so it won't be done soon.Firstly, I'm wondering for meguVIT, under the One-Click encoder, whether it's possible to provide our own .d2v files. Usually when creating my own .d2v files I will cut out advertisements and unnecessary stuff. Currently it is not possible to load .d2v files, but one has to load the .VOB files along with said adverts and stuff.
You shouldn't. Rollyco has tweaked the MeGui executable - updating the MeGui core would remove the changes, updating other files will break things. MeguIVit currently only updates plugins so it doesn't affect this behaviour. When I finally get round to releasing the next MeguIVit, it will be with a new MeGui executable and all the latest updates (but getting further updates is disabled on my version for exactly the same reasons).Second, how do I manually update x264?
Yes, I have come across this 4:3 / 16:9 mixed content problem and tried to solve it. I just used trim to do the different crops. Autocrop will not work - it just samples every few hundred frames across the entire vid and chooses the most conservative crop. A clever use of runtime functions in an AviSynth script would probably do it. But the problem lies later on: you now have two aspect ratios in the same vid - I couldn't get MPC-HC or VLC to properly acknowledge an AR change mid-video. I tried changing the SPS values mid-stream, they were either ignored or broke things. Coincidently, the DivX h264 codec definitely does acknowledge AR changes in the bitstream - you need to adjust an advanced setting - but the players still mostly ignore what the decoder is telling them anyway.Has anyone encountered videos where the black bars at the side vary in size?
The one-click encoder is very limited in what it will accept as input. That's one of the things I've been working on, to allow it to accept avi, mpg, d2v, m2ts etc. But it's tiresome work because the one-click code in MeGui is a hacky mess, so it won't be done soon.
You shouldn't. Rollyco has tweaked the MeGui executable - updating the MeGui core would remove the changes, updating other files would break them. MeguIVit currently only updates plugins, not the core. When I finally get round to releasing the next MeguIVit, it will be with a new MeGui executable and all the latest updates.
Yes, I have come across this 4:3 / 16:9 mixed content problem and tried to solve it. I just used trim to do the different crops. Autocrop will not work - it just samples every few hundred frames across the entire vid and chooses the most conservative crop. A clever use of runtime functions in an AviSynth script would probably do it. But the problem lies later on: you now have two aspect ratios in the same vid - I couldn't get MPC-HC or VLC to properly acknowledge an AR change mid-video. I tried changing the SPS values mid-stream, still ignored or broken...
I understood you. My experience of updating only small parts of the MeGui package has been negative. You would hope that you could just update the x264.exe like a new version of a plugin, but it's not quite that simple. The x264 configuration dialog (where you set things like CRF, AVC Level etc) is part of the MeGUI core. The x264 presets also come separately and need to certainly match the core (for the dialog) and preferably x264 (for the command line). At the very least this means you are will not be able to use the latest features of x264 without changing core, and at worst it means you will be sending invalid commands to it. It might work, but it's not a great idea long term...Hmmm I'm not sure if you understood me correctly. I want to update the x264 encoder executable, not the MeGUI core file. Is the x264 executable part of MeGUI.exe?
If having different sizes of black bars means that the AR of the video is consistent, then when you remove them surely the AR won't be consistent any more...? Which may answer your latter question...At this point I'm tackling videos where the black bars vary in size across different scenes, but the aspect ratio stays consistent. <snip> I have always wondered why would the post production team degrade video quality by applying letterboxing...
I thought you were using MeguIVit? But that log file looks like it's from MeguIV (it uses TempGaussMC rather than QuickTGMC). If you did use MeguIVit then you didn't follow the instructions, probably the bit about selecting a preset.There must be things I still do not understand. The entire process seems to have stopped after encoding the first VOB file to uncompressed avi. Am I wrong in thinking it should continue to process all the VOB files in the folder into one large continuous AVI, and then make a second pass? Here is the log file:
I understood you. My experience of updating only small parts of the MeGui package has been negative. You would hope that you could just update the x264.exe like a new version of a plugin, but it's not quite that simple. The x264 configuration dialog (where you set things like CRF, AVC Level etc) is part of the MeGUI core. The x264 presets also come separately and need to certainly match the core (for the dialog) and preferably x264 (for the command line). At the very least this means you are will not be able to use the latest features of x264 without changing core, and at worst it means you will be sending invalid commands to it. It might work, but it's not a great idea long term...
program --preset slow --crf 20.7 --psy-rd 1.0:0.10 --output "output" "input"
If having different sizes of black bars means that the AR of the video is consistent, then when you remove them surely the AR won't be consistent any more...? Which may answer your latter question...
Or are you saying that your vid has the inconsistent AR and by removing the bars you will fix it?
This is getting confusing. The point is it's better that your Megui core is consistent with your x264 so the settings you make actually work. A made-up example of what can happen:...presets...
That will ensure AR of the output is consistent, but it will change the AR of the source material. However, I didn't realize you were referring to such tiny borders, in which case the slight AR change in the source will be barely noticable. I had pictured borders 20 wide on one scene and 60 wide on another. Cropping both, then resizing to 720x480 would create major distortion in that case.In either case, I will use a Spline36Resize(720,480) after cropping to keep the AR consistent.
This is getting confusing. The point is it's better that your Megui core is consistent with your x264 so the settings you make actually work. A made-up example of what can happen:
- You select "Fast Decode" tuning
- The (out of date) megui core thinks that tuning implies Deblocking=false
- But the up to date x264 thinks it implies Deblocking=true (they've improved deblocking speed)
- So the deblocking checkbox in Megui is very likely to work incorrectly and you may or may not get the deblocking you expected.
I seen real examples of this even when my files are close to the same date (lesser settings, but the same idea). This kind of problem isn't sure to happen, but it illustrates the reasons why you should keep Megui all updated together. In any case, have there been any major improvements in x264 since the version in MeguiIV (lots of minor stuff is all I recall)?
That will ensure AR of the output is consistent, but it will change the AR of the source material. However, I didn't realize you were referring to such tiny borders, in which case the slight AR change in the source will be barely noticable. I had pictured borders 20 wide on one scene and 60 wide on another. Cropping both, then resizing to 720x480 would create major distortion in that case.