*sigh* they're not. Do not judge by its photoshopped cover. Try watch several of them, and it will be clear for you that some are well past 20.They always seem to have girls that *look* like they're too young,
Really? AFAIK age of consent is the only criteria.even though they are actually 18+ and in some countries movies count as kiddy porn even if they only look too young. So I guess it depends on where you live.
Why did you argue the first quote completely ignoring the next statement? It's even in your next quote and you STILL ignored it.*sigh* they're not. Do not judge by its photoshopped cover. Try watch several of them, and it will be clear for you that some are well past 20.They always seem to have girls that *look* like they're too young,
even though they are actually 18+ and in some countries movies count as kiddy porn even if they only look too young. So I guess it depends on where you live.
It goes beyond that though. Not only do they dress the part, but they also act, behave, speak like they're children. They juxtapose short actresses with tall actors to enhance the effect, and most movies are some form of loli incest roleplay. That's the whole premise of the series they make, lolis. I have nothing against MUM videos, but these are the kind of things that will set them off on first impressions for most outsiders looking in.Wearing school clothes and twintail do not make them looks underage.