The least favorite genre

[pukimai]

OK, so after we have all the favorites (series, actresses, etc), now, can we talk about the genre that you don't like most ? I know there are a lot of genre out there, and everybody have their own cup of tea, so this thread is not to judge other people's favorite, but only to make a little chit chat, and maybe, with the input from other member here, that least favorite genre, could be the most favorite

OK, since i'm starting it, i'll give my opinion.

Up to now, i never watch gay JAV, mature JAV, BBW JAV, and maybe a lot of other genre, so my JAV collection is always based on young Japanese girl, so based on JAV that i ever watched, the least one is the one with the male actor being the cameramen too, i really don't like these type of genre, since i can't enjoy the beauty of the actresses completely, the angles are very limited to one camera only, where sometimes, the camera is positioned in a far location, or very near location. That's for me, so waiting the responses from other members

 

[Supmop]

the most dislike :

dirty yucky stuff (scat, vomit, ecc)
gay male vs male action
full female domination (without any scene that the girl get fuck by real penis)
solo & masturbation only with or without sex toys
tentacle sex
full body paint
fake penis (like Rookie's super long dick series)
fake penetration
super skinny girl
bukkake
gokkun
HJ, FJ & BJ only

rare to watch :

transexual / newhalf
loli
hard bondage
gangbang
lesbian only

 

[Blade Runner]

Scat and vomit (no comment)
Sunshine Boys (grandpa/uncle/father-in-law getting busy with women half their age)
Tentacle/monster (don't bother)
Body paint (chocolate yes, paint no)
Gay/Transsexual (don't bother)
Toilet/Urinal (yawn)
Gangbang (yawn)
Incest (yawn)

 

[needs more loli]

I'm pretty neutral on most genres, the only thing I hate is fake stuff:
fake rubber dicks
fake cum
fake nakadashi
fake penetration

that and really old, fat out of shape women. *shudders*

 

[pikuseru]

Why people don't like the gay stuff? It's the 21st century now. Gay, straight, it's all the same now. There are no more lines.

 

[Electromog]

I don't like scat/vomit, gay/lesbian, scenes where they write on the woman and scenes where the women stay fully dressed the whole time. Also not into SM unless it's pretty light.

As to why? Who knows, you like what you like.

 

[needs more loli]

Well I for one enjoy me some newhalf porn, but only if the "girl" is cute. I've even fapped to cute JGV twink boys and that was pretty great too. I guess I can fap to anything as long as its cute.

 

[Inertia]

I don't like sex toys (vibrators, magic wands, dildos, etc.). Scenes that pretty much only feature them are snooze fests. The only exception would be extreme instances like when a magic wand is literally taped to the woman.

 

[Anonym2]

Why people don't like the gay stuff? It's the 21st century now. Gay, straight, it's all the same now. There are no more lines.

People don't like gay stuff because they do not find it attractive. What century it is doesn't change peoples' sexual preferences. Gay and straight are not the same. There are still lines.

 

[hatsupaw]

Semen on food, or collected in receptacles to be drunk later.
Gals/Gyaru/Black gals/KoGals - whatever you like to call them.
Lesbians with sex toys.

 

[Ghostbird]

Out of shape male performers with big bellies ruins otherwise really good material for me.


Bigger titties than the female performers



Obese/Sickly thin female performers

 

[ding73ding]

Gay porn stopped annoying me quite a while ago. Scat, vomit and menses still irritate me but it's not so in-your-face (sorry for that imagery) recently so it's alright... Real transgender porn also is yucky (but I enjoy fake futanari) but once I learn to detect those covers (a subtle way these trannies pose for photos or even more vaguely, how they carry themselves) it's also avoidable/tolerable.

All these are unfavorites but not really worth expounding in a thread. What's really worth ranting about are genres and trends that doesn't exactly gross me out or causes massive acute erectile deflation, but... you watch, you fap, you cum, it does the job but kind of with a big meh~ vidi, yes, veni, technically yes, but not a vici, not quite.

POV: I am not the one fucking Shunka Ayami or Julia, I know that. I am watching someone else fucking her. No amount of camera trick can fool me into thinking I am the one fucking the actress. Let's stop being a total bakka about it. OK?

Incest: sure I get that anything that's forbidden is potentially exciting and kinky. But incest singularly fails to excites me. Watch man A and woman B have sex, great. But if A and B are close relatives, does that add to the enjoyment? And then... 99% of incest JAV simply fail to be convincing that A and B are close relatives. I don't mind "fake" but I mind "not even trying to fake it". Final point (will be recurring), I can't help but think the main target audience of incest JAV are LOSERS. I am not a loser, but being so near LOSERS (by watching the same garbage LOSERS watch) is bound to rub off.

Soapland: I don't mind paying 5000 Yens or whatever to have a girl give me a soapy wash and hand job, not ideal, but fine. A better situation would be to meet some girl and get a room for no condom sex, it's better because it's not a following a scripted procedure, "negotiating" to ejaculate in a girl's mouth is even more exciting than the actual moment of ejaculation. I also don't mind paying 2000 Yens or whatever to watch a girl have sex on screen. The product offers no physical sensation (unlike soapland) but the quality of the girl (face and figure) is sensational and sometimes you get to play or act out scenarios that's totally unreal (e.g. Black Gal Bitch Airline or Unicycle Policewoman). Crossing soapland and JAV is totally pointless, it combines the negatives of both acts: lack of real (physical) sensation and lack of any story or spontaneity or variables. Soapland vid is far more dry and flavorless than even the typical all-sex porn. True all sex porn offers no story or twist but at least the sex act itself doesn't follow a strict script. In soapland, even the hand motion for stirring the soapy gel is prescribed (and very unnatural looking). Finally, again, the same LOSERS issue applies. Who need to watch an AV of someone using soapland service? Most likely a LOSER who can't afford or too shy to actually go visit a soapland.

Sorry if I sounded like a certain scumbag oops I mean reality politician. But I am ANGRY.

 

[kharo88]

Well, to me, least favourite doesn't necessarily mean something that I hate, just something that I like the least (which I still like), in this particular instance, out of every genre that I actually watch. Maybe I'm misinterpreting this... Anyway! Many people have listed scat/gay/trans etc., and I agree, but I don't think that I can judge those genres since I don't watch those because they obviously don't appeal to me. So as for my least favourite genre, I'd have to say femdom, and that's a funny one, because I'm not into "proper" femdom - the femdom that I like to watch isn't "proper" femdom, but I dislike it because it's not "proper" femdom in a different way. Complicated, huh? Let me give you an example, and a very recent one - a film that I'm sure many of you have checked out!

MXGS-854 Immediate Distribution!Immediately 虐!Torture Hotel Akiho Yoshizawa

I was very much looking forward to this title. I like Akiho Yoshizawa (who doesn't, really?), I like girls in qi pao even more, and I just love when the girl is naughty (but not nasty). She's even rocking that lovely hairstyle. And please note the title. "Torture Hotel". That would be a pretty scary term if this weren't JAV. But it is, so we know it's going to be the pleasant kind of torture. And yes, there's some of that nice naughtiness that I like in femdom, and yes, sometimes it's the kind of femdom that's a bit too nasty for my taste, but when it comes to sex, you can forget about the premise of the film. Femdom? No! Torture? Not at all! The sex scenes might start out with Akiho Yoshizawa in control and eventually on top, but soon, the guy will take over and be the dominating one. In other words: it's just like any other "regular" film out there. And if you treat it like a regular film with a qi pao cosplay thrown in, it's a good one. But she's supposed to be a domina for hire here. These guys are supposed to be submissive all the way to the end. She's supposed to "torture" them with pleasure and make them beg for that sweet, final release, not let them do whatever they want once they're having sex. It's got nice moments, for sure, but overall, it's pretty disappointing, and sadly, this is what tends to happen in femdom titles nowadays. And don't get me wrong, like I said, I'm not into hardcore femdom either, but it would be great if they could find the golden mean (I think that's how you say it in English).

 

[Fisheraaa]

Dont have as many as some of you guys mentined but, still have a few.

Scat
Gay
Fat/ugly/way too old (goes for both women and men)
BDSM
Interracial

Anything else aside from those, can be good fapping material if done right.

 

[Anonym2]

POV: I am not the one fucking Shunka Ayami or Julia, I know that. I am watching someone else fucking her. No amount of camera trick can fool me into thinking I am the one fucking the actress. Let's stop being a total bakka about it. OK?

Soapland: I don't mind paying 5000 Yens or whatever to have a girl give me a soapy wash and hand job, not ideal, but fine. A better situation would be to meet some girl and get a room for no condom sex, it's better because it's not a following a scripted procedure, "negotiating" to ejaculate in a girl's mouth is even more exciting than the actual moment of ejaculation. I also don't mind paying 2000 Yens or whatever to watch a girl have sex on screen. The product offers no physical sensation (unlike soapland) but the quality of the girl (face and figure) is sensational and sometimes you get to play or act out scenarios that's totally unreal (e.g. Black Gal Bitch Airline or Unicycle Policewoman). Crossing soapland and JAV is totally pointless, it combines the negatives of both acts: lack of real (physical) sensation and lack of any story or spontaneity or variables. Soapland vid is far more dry and flavorless than even the typical all-sex porn. True all sex porn offers no story or twist but at least the sex act itself doesn't follow a strict script. In soapland, even the hand motion for stirring the soapy gel is prescribed (and very unnatural looking). Finally, again, the same LOSERS issue applies. Who need to watch an AV of someone using soapland service? Most likely a LOSER who can't afford or too shy to actually go visit a soapland.

The appeal of these is that in general they shoot it so that the guy is off screen as much possible (looking at guys is aesthetically unpleasing) and they usually tell them to stfu so you don't have to hear them moan or talk (unpleasing to the ears). You don't have to imagine yourself be the guy, it's just the fact that you don't have to see or hear him.

 

[ding73ding]

That's one of the best cover ever, Akiho rocks it, quite. Can't say I\ catch exactly what you looking for in femdom. But I totally gets your peeves about MXGS-854. It was going to be no. 4 in my rant, femdom, S&M, fetish, that cosplay, sitpron (situation porn, not sitcom) that is totally missing the "soul" of the genre/theme.

The clearest example are cosplay or heroine genre that has basically a run-of-mill gang r*** except (1) the r*** vid is prefixed by a cheap (not just in production budget, but "cheap" in the heart of the director/producers/actors) 30 second set-up scene that's total failure in super-heroineic, (2) the r*** happens with a costume(s) on. Another example is sitporn of the Secret Investigator/Undercover Agent slant. From beginning to end, you never get even a lamest attempt to establish the girl is strong and capable, anything but a helpless r*** victim.

Can't get that cover out of my mind. I've in my mind Zentradi gangbang of Lynn Minmay in qipao, and finally winning the war with the sound of her orgasmic moan. And I leave it to your imagination what exactly is "protoculture" and where you get it from.

 

[kharo88]

Can't say I\ catch exactly what you looking for in femdom.

That's not your fault, I didn't really explain what I meant in regards to that! I have summed up my feelings about femdom in another thread, so I'll just shamelessly copy/paste that: "I find what I call gentle femdom to be great: the girl is in control and she uses that power to please herself and the guy at the same time without doing any nasty stuff. On the other hand, when there's bootlicking, trampling, kicking, slapping, strap-on etc. that's not my cup of tea."

But I totally gets your peeves about MXGS-854. It was going to be no. 4 in my rant, femdom, S&M, fetish, that cosplay, sitpron (situation porn, not sitcom) that is totally missing the "soul" of the genre/theme.

The clearest example are cosplay or heroine genre that has basically a run-of-mill gang r*** except (1) the r*** vid is prefixed by a cheap (not just in production budget, but "cheap" in the heart of the director/producers/actors) 30 second set-up scene that's total failure in super-heroineic, (2) the r*** happens with a costume(s) on. Another example is sitporn of the Secret Investigator/Undercover Agent slant. From beginning to end, you never get even a lamest attempt to establish the girl is strong and capable, anything but a helpless r*** victim.

Exactly! Soulless is the right word when it comes to these films, I think. I would also call them dishonest to a certain extent, because they advertise the video to about something that, at its core, it's not. Sure, they put some things in to make the film look like it's going to deliver on its promise, but after watching it, you know that it was just a regular film. It's kind of like advertising that you have a "man-eating chicken" in your circus and when the curtain goes up it turns out that it's just a "man, eating chicken". Nothing extraordinary, and certainly not what you had expected.

 

[Supmop]

Why people don't like the gay stuff? It's the 21st century now. Gay, straight, it's all the same now. There are no more lines.

because I'm straight

I don't mind be friends with gay, some of my friends are gay, but I don't like to see them having sex

I don't mix my social live with my sexual orientation, and like anonym2 said : what century it is doesn't change peoples' sexual preferences, gay and straight are different

 

[needs more loli]

I'm pretty sure he meant that by now people should be more open minded.

 

[ding73ding]

Being open minded or not has nothing to do with this thread. It's about our collective and individual preference (or here the opposite) in porn and/or sex. I am perfectly open minded about baldness, in some context it's totally badass. But in porn, if there's a genre of bald ladies, it would be a major unfavorites.

We love a liberal society that make sure say gay people wouldn't be excluded from say a restaurant. What about upscale nightclub? Can they exclude gays and lesbians? Maybe that's ok. Nightclubs can discriminate based on age, wealth and attractiveness. They are entitled to keep out fat guys and ugly girls. It's fair game to exclude gays and lesbians too.

I sympathize with gay right, because I know a puritan society wouldn't just stop at oppressing gays, they would almost certainly find excuses to oppress my kind of sins, vices and perversions. Do I want to live in a society that accepts gays and bald women, absolutely yes. Do I want to see two hairy dudes in a 69 or bald women having sex? Absolutely no.