I've gotten chance to watch the video and I think she does pass for a loli, maybe just barely.Minnano isn't working for me today so I don't know her height. The only info I can find on google is for the women's basketball player of the same name, I do not think they are the same person.
To be honest I go off less by height as they are all short (<5'), and she definitely fits the appearance. I think of all the current loli girls currently she has the best body/face. There are plenty of <140cm girls that don't look loli at all in my opinion because of their proportions. "Mini" is a separate genre for a reason and many girls in that genre can't very well pass as lolis.
The important thing is what the JAV is billed under, and that JAV is listed as under the Loli genre, the first one from Kawaii in a long time. Of course sometimes they list questionable genres, but I think in this case it is definitely apt and the most loli video Kawaii has ever made.
You should download it and see for yourself though, it is one of my favorite videos of the year and she is great.
Actually using personal preference to try and skew the thread is exactly what I hate. I've noticed in a lot of the other threads people blatantly ignoring the topic and spamming a list of their favorite actresses, then coming up with farfetched reasoning as to why its just to include them.You guys are making it seem like there is some kind of loli purity test based on what you personally find attractive.
Girl
ロリ系
It's a genre, and if something is filmed as loli then it isn't really debatable. Kawaii has stopped doing them recently, but they are the ones that debuted Nagomi, Sakai Miyu and others in the thread.
Sora Shiina on the other hand works almost exclusively outside of the genre, and yet she is included in this thread.
BTW I guess Kawaii had 2 loli videos this month, still downloading the other.
View attachment 754489
Welcome to the dark side aka the loli side lol (terrible pun). Maybe check out Marie Konishi as well, IMO she fits into the same category as Ichigo Aoi and Suzu Ichinose: not incredibly cute or pretty but amazing in terms of performance.I've seen Morino Kotori's name while I was browsing javpop but I didn't see a trailer yet. She's has a cute smile and a great body. I didn't expect a song in her first movie trailer lol.
Needs more loli talked about MIRD-167, and I have to said that not only this movie seems great because there is Yukari, but there is Shizuku Kotohane, one loli I found this week.
View attachment 754605 View attachment 754606
I'm quiet in a loli fever those past days. I have grown interest for Ichigo Aoi and I downloaded MIGD-677. A really good non conventional anal movie (2 girls with one lucky guy). And last, but not the least, Suzu Ichinose, who seems to be retired but it would be a shame to skip her movies (Need to finish watching Ichigo Aoi anal movie and one title of Shizuku Kotohane before watching one movie of her).
Thats unfortunate, this looks great especially for a train molester type video which are often terrible.Wtf happened to MIAD-944? It dissappeared from everywhere, dmm, moody'z site..
The image is still there, but there is no listing, shame because it looks like a great movie.
I've gotten chance to watch the video and I think she does pass for a loli, maybe just barely.
But I dont think accepting something as loli based on what it says on the label is a good way to approach it. I've seen far too many videos labeled "cum" that have barely any cum play. Or movies labeled "big dick" only to see the male actors severely lacking. Likewise, videos that say "loli" in the title or tag that have actresses who look too grown or mature.
Actually using personal preference to try and skew the thread is exactly what I hate. I've noticed in a lot of the other threads people blatantly ignoring the topic and spamming a list of their favorite actresses, then coming up with farfetched reasoning as to why its just to include them.
Which is why I think it's important to have a definition that is measurable and quantifiable; unfortunately simply defining loli as "little girl" or "young girl" is subject to some personal preference. I've found that height is the easiest way to set a limit, albeit a soft limit, on what qualifies as loli. As height diverges above from this soft limit one should become more mindful of the fact that the actress might be falling into the shoujo "young woman" category instead; it's in this range that you have to start considering things like body proportions (arm, leg, and torso length, breast and hip size, hand and feet size), hairstyle, shaved, the youthfulness of their face and skin, and marketing, etc.
Which is also why I'm curious: which <140cm girls are not loli to you?
Anyway, to make things simpler (or maybe not) when in doubt just ask yourself this: does the girl look more like a young girl or a young woman?
I haven't seen KAWD-741 yet but based on the cover she most certainly looks like a young woman to me. That's not that to say she is not pretty or anything like that it's just that she doesn't give me the same feeling that a loli would. Feel free to discuss them, I think most people who like lolis are also into the shoujo type as well given that the two categories are adjacent to each other and in many cases overlapping.
It sounds like you are saying the same things I'm saying... more or less...
I agree about Miko, as you said: just because Prestige did not market her a loli doesn't change the fact that she is a loli.
But the part you are missing is this: just because Kawaii does market a girl as loli doesn't change the fact that she isn't a loli or automatically make her a loli.
When did I say she doesn't belong in this thread (wouldn't even think you were talking to me if you didn't bring up my omomo)? I wasnt trying to be an authority on loli, I thought this was a loli discussion thread lol. Was just pointing out she has a "pie face" and hairstyle that I associate with mature talent. Looking at the first page of mature woman you linked, my feelings have been strengthened. I do see alot of mature woman with a very similar look to Mio Shinosaki (facially) on the first page alone (not sure how you can't see it). Even with my criticism that her face isnt "loli enough" I still think she is hot. But even if I thought she was hideous and doesn't belong in this thread, its still just my opinion and you don't have to agree with it. So not sure what you are so worked up about.That's great. I don't care. Your profile pic is of a dwarf. I don't think you are the ultimate authority on lolis.
You like dwarf porn, that's fine but that is a different genre as far as I'm concerned. And it's not just me, most work under mini rather than loli. Practically the only MUM videos not billed as Loli feature such dwarves as "Mini" instead because even they know they don't truly pass despite every single Minimum title being "Loli" themed. That is not loli. I'm sitting here having to defend one of the best loli debuts in months against people who think that just because someone is a dwarf and therefore unusually short that she is the perfect loli.
I get it, dwarves are short. What's special about that? Nothing, it's just an average dwarf. Not "Oh wow, she is so short she looks so young", more like "Wow, she sure is a dwarf who will always look like that with her oversized prominent forehead, jutting jaw, and bowed legs shorter relative to her torso. The textbook definition of someone born with achondroplasia."
Dwarves aren't all that bad though, they have an easier time maintaining their (unimpressive) figure because it is a medical condition they were born with. You can't really tell the difference when they are 18 or 35 (because without miracle make-up they all look like they are older). Some are pretty attractive, but I don't think they are the ideal and really it goes against the whole idea of what "loli" is trying to capture in my opinion. It's cheating in a way. For people who are easily fooled by height alone. Put a wig on Warwick Davis, I'm not sure you could tell the difference.
Me personally, I don't like my girls to have bodies like tree stumps.
edit: I'll admit I'm being pretty harsh, but I think it is kind of bullshit that you two are pulling this "she doesn't belong in this thread" just because you don't like her as much. Going through this thread there are many girls I don't like, girls I don't think of as loli because they almost NEVER do loli videos, or are in fact dwarves. I mean talking about your ideal loli body is one thing, but trying to enforce your personal standards on others is kind of bullshit. God damn right you should allow other people to at the very least go by what the studios themselves market rather than your personal bullshit check list. No hair, like wtf do you not realize that they shave. It's not like any of them are naturally hairless, how the fuck does that "disqualify a girl".
Why can't we just talk about new releases, and various girls we like (not just who you like). If you don't like a girl maybe hold your tongue or at least when you criticize her stop pulling this "that's not a 'real' loli" bullshit.
"Mature face"
View attachment 754839
My ass, she doesn't look like a Mature Woman. Like Maki Hojo? Give me a break, she has a far more youthful face than 90% of the dwarves <143 cm. She just happens to share a haircut with a couple other JAV stars who are older and not loli, that's meaningless. It shouldn't be held against her. Brush her bangs back and she doesn't have a giant forehead at least. She looks younger than most here.
View attachment 754840
Why the fuck does every god damn thing on the internet have to devolve into negativity, and arguing. I can't even fucking escape it when I want to jerk off? I'm about done with this whole damn thread, and it's a shame because it was fun finally being able to talk about and share newly discovered or favorite JAV. But I don't need all this negative bullshit. At least no one in this thread (on a file sharing forum) is on their high horse getting on my case for pirating JAV like I'm some terrible, selfish monster ruining the industry like in the AV Open 2016 thread... yet.
Welcome to the dark side aka the loli side lol (terrible pun). Maybe check out Marie Konishi as well, IMO she fits into the same category as Ichigo Aoi and Suzu Ichinose: not incredibly cute or pretty but amazing in terms of performance.
Thats unfortunate, this looks great especially for a train molester type video which are often terrible.
There is a reason that they are usually marketed under mini rather than loli. I don't want to overly insult anyone's taste. But quite a few of them look like dwarves in their mid-thirties rather than "lolis". They are stocky with short legs, extremely wide hips for their size, rough faces, and broad dwarvish shoulders.
I use my eyes when identifying a loli and not if a studio labeled something as loli.
...Feel free to discuss them, I think most people who like lolis are also into the shoujo type as well given that the two categories are adjacent to each other and in many cases overlapping.
First time seeing this actress I think, no clue what her name is.Does anyone know who the last girl in IBW-544 is? I hate how IB Works never lists their actresses..
Also, does anyone have a full version of VRTM-089? All the copies floating around seem to be only half of the movie, there was an mkv version released that was twice the size but it's all but disappeared from the net it seems.
now that girl in the back on the far left should be the one we all gang up on and take away her loli pass. If you want to talk about someone looking like a tree stump. She should get her own category "Big Mini".
The VRTM-089 I have is the 991MB version. I didn't even realize it wasn't the full version, guess I always busted before making it to the end