Why Law Enforcement Goes For the Small Stuff

Sakunyuusha

New Member
Jan 27, 2008
1,855
3
I've seen this sentiment voiced a lot throughout my life: "don't the police have better things to do than to be [doing whatever we're discussing]?" And so I've given it a lot of thought. I'm sure you all have, too. But maybe we've reached different conclusions to the same question. So I thought I'd share mine, since once again someone's brought this point up -- this time with regards to monitoring hentai.

The police must deliver![hide]
Suppose we have several categories of cases. It might look something like this:
(1) super big deals, like finding a man who threatens the very existence of the country
(2) big deals, like infiltrating and bringing down a drug ring
(3) middle deals, like going after people who scam the elderly out of their life savings
(4) small deals, like going after the guy who downloaded cartoon porn

Not only do these crimes differ in their severity (with 1 being worst and 4 being least bad), but they also differ inversely in their ease of solvency (with 4 being the easiest case to crack and 1 being the most difficult). To find a guy who downloads cartoon porn is a very simple task which takes little time to execute and has no pitfalls for law enforcement officials. To break up a scam takes a little more tact: if you go in guns blazin', you'll tip them off and they'll run away. Bringing down a drug ring is very difficult and has major risks for the law enforcement officials involved in the case. And finding Public Enemy #1 is probably the most difficult thing of all -- he's hiding within the national borders of our enemies, meaning you have to go into the lion's den to find him and risk being killed by anyone in the population just so you can find this one man.

Finding Public Enemy #1 can take years and years and years. Busting a drug ring, years. Busting a scam, a year, two tops. Finding the cartoon porn downloader, days.

If the police do not deliver results (in the form of concluded cases), the public believes that they are not doing their job and that society is poorly-protected.

So the police do deliver, and by so doing they prevent chaos from erupting. Because chaos would erupt if people felt the police were stretched too thin and weren't doing shit. So the police make it look as though they are everywhere and anywhere, solving crimes 24/7. And you know what? They sure are! But the crimes they're solving 24/7 are stolen lollipops and stolen video games. They're not solving as many murders as they should be, and they're definitely not solving as many national security threats as they should be. There's too few law enforcement officials and not enough time to do it all. And since the people demand results, they've got to deliver.[/hide]
 

techie

SuupaOtaku
Jul 24, 2008
568
4
To answer the question by the simplest possible answer, and since I like You have a standard saying about these things...

"Humans are lazy by nature and xenophobes by conditioning..."

The short answer to the title of the topic is...

"For the purpose of getting the most media attention with the least possible effort to project the appearance of doing as much as possible at the same time."
 

shoreleaveoic

Non Member
Jun 14, 2009
20
0
Well said, I couldn't have said it better myself. Go after what you can deal with...sad but true.
 

Animedevildog

New Member
Aug 27, 2009
6
1
They go after the smallest ones (#4) mainly because those are the easiest to catch. The only time when they go after the bigger stuff is when they feel they have a decient enough chance of catching the perp, making it worth the effort required. Image is important to law enforcement, and if they primarily focused on the big guns, then they would have a much smaller percentage rate of sucess. Would you hire a company with a small rate of sucess to do your business. Thats why the cops play this game in this manner.
 
Jul 1, 2009
225
11
For traffic violations, revenue generation has become a prime motivator, especially with governments looking to find income in the current difficult economic climate.