i have it as a goal to post every MUSO- series video that is censored and all the great associated and complimentary uncensored ppv produced by Night24. so as far as the MUSO- censored versus Night24 uncensored division is concerned i am wholely non-discriminatory.
in fact, i know many japanese friends and friends behind the great wall won't download uncensored video on their personal 'puters and storage devices. others gobble that shit up! Kink.com and Peter Acworth is supreme!
personally i have long ago embraced japanese censoring and have never viewed censored video as second class video but a mere limitation on an art form. was "silent" film better or worse than "talkies"; was "black and white" better or worse than "color film"? that is how i view censoring - it is a limit on an art form.
that doesn't mean i like censoring - i am for the abolition of all censoring, especially all japanese meiji era forms of censoring, and i would argue that Article 21 of the constitution of japan [guaranteeing freedom of expression] should trump Article 175 of the japanese criminal code [from which pixelization is derived].
i am from the US and most of the time the 1st Amendment of the US Const makes legal pornography unless it is deemed "obscene". but in the US there are cases in which bondage, SM, fisting, beastiality have been determined obscene [pretty much everything zool likes]. even Hustlers Magazine for dog's sake has been determined obscene in different states. and it goes without saying that child pornography is obscene pretty much everywhere in the world.
that notiion of "obscenity" that exists in the US doesn't exist in japan. pixelate the genitals and the riot of genres that is the hallmark of japan pornography is legal. what is the better system?