JAV actresses with natural breasts

sendagaya said:
Is Asahi Mizuno real or fake? I think fake after going through this thread.
Click to expand...
Yeah... you know I have very strong opinion... but participating in this thread is really affecting my outlook.

A few days ago I would put Mizuno and many of my fav busty idols as 100% real. Now I am starting to think many of my Goddesses are in fact maybe-artificial.

Maybe we (I) need a new scale:
1. absolutely uncontroversially universally all natural, example: Nene Yoshitaka 吉高寧々 my preference: unerectable, I guess they are all A-cup
2. almost certainly all natural, example: Rion, 希崎ジェシカ, Hitomi, my preference: mixed, everything from all time favs to total meh to unerectable are in here
3. zero evidence of fake, but just a bit more suspicious than 2., example: Asahi Mizuno, my preference: mixed to positive
4. zero evidence of fake, but too amazing/perfect to be natural, example: Sakura Miura, my preference: awesome!
5. zero evidence of fake, but not quite as floopy as expected, example: Anri Okita, my preference: awesome!
6. zero direct evidence of fake, but circumstantial evidence (changing over time), example: Mio Kimijima, my preference: awesome!
7. positive evidence of fake, but very rare to see, example: Shoko Takahashi, my preference: excellent!
8. probable evidence of fake, too wide-base etc, example: Rin Sasahara 咲々原リン, my preference: OK fappable
9. mild fail to flop, example: ???, my preference: unerectable
10. total fail to flop, example: ???, my preference : double unerectable
11. serious misshappening, example: HUSR-169 (e.g. this), my prefrence: triple unerectable
 
Last edited:
What about Asuna Kawai 河合あすな 88H-59-89?

I actually don't have many (if any!) of her vids. She always seems like a Cat. 8 (too wide base) to me so I always attracted by her covers but never downloaded her vids. Then... I noticed this promo frame (which is perhaps not as honest as video frame, studio might do photoshop on sample frames)
118abp00822jp-13.jpg


Is the right boob showing mild misshapening? It could also be normal shape change caused by mid-stroke upward-heaving, I don't know if it's positive proof, the photo just has a fake feel to it.

Ohh and then look at the reverse cum shot, so fake! Can believe anything on these promo pix!
 
ding73ding said:
What about Asuna Kawai 河合あすな 88H-59-89?

I actually don't have many (if any!) of her vids. She always seems like a Cat. 8 (too wide base) to me so I always attracted by her covers but never downloaded her vids. Then... I noticed this promo frame (which is perhaps not as honest as video frame, studio might do photoshop on sample frames)
118abp00822jp-13.jpg


Is the right boob showing mild misshapening? It could also be normal shape change caused by mid-stroke upward-heaving, I don't know if it's positive proof, the photo just has a fake feel to it.

Ohh and then look at the reverse cum shot, so fake! Can believe anything on these promo pix!
Click to expand...

Have 3 of her vids ABP-709, ABP--731 & ABP-812 & they bounce and jiggle and shake like crazy no matter the position and slide down toward her arm pits when lying on her back. No weird lines, natural shape and really soft and squeezy so look very natural.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ding73ding
I hate to complicate the matter, but my sister who is a doctor, specializing in issues that effect the breasts, primarily breast cancer, has told me that even she can't always tell. She's done breast exams on women who she was almost certain had had implants, only to then look at their mammograms and see that they hadn't, and examined others who didn't look like they had only to discover they did. The main reason is the % of fat in the breasts which can vary enormously. Commonly breasts are composed of more than 50% fat, but the shape and feel of a breast with 51% fat is very different from one that is 75% or more fat. Many women however have what they call dense breasts, which are breasts where supportive tissue ie... muscle, makeup more than 50% of the breast and a combination of everything else including fat makeup less than 50%. If a woman's breast density goes over 75% they are classified as having extremely dense breasts, ie breasts with very little fat. Women with dense or extremely dense breasts have much firmer breasts than the average woman. A major downside is that they get breast cancer more often and when they do it isn't caught in it's early stages as dense breast tissue & implants both make detection much more difficult. Dense breasts can be naturally occurring or can be the result of physical activity. Women who are athletes and work heavily on their chest muscles, can develop denser breasts. An extreme example would be competitive women body builders who have very little body fat and an over abundance of hard muscle. Typically as women age they develop more breast fat and of course during pregnancy the % of breast fat also increases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ding73ding and darksider59
david mcgee said:
I hate to complicate the matter, but my sister who is a doctor, specializing in issues that effect the breasts, primarily breast cancer, has told me that even she can't always tell. She's done breast exams on women who she was almost certain had had implants, only to then look at their mammograms and see that they hadn't, and examined others who didn't look like they had only to discover they did. The main reason is the % of fat in the breasts which can vary enormously. Commonly breasts are composed of more than 50% fat, but the shape and feel of a breast with 51% fat is very different from one that is 75% or more fat. Many women however have what they call dense breasts, which are breasts where supportive tissue ie... muscle, makeup more than 50% of the breast and a combination of everything else including fat makeup less than 50%. If a woman's breast density goes over 75% they are classified as having extremely dense breasts, ie breasts with very little fat. Women with dense or extremely dense breasts have much firmer breasts than the average woman. A major downside is that they get breast cancer more often and when they do it isn't caught in it's early stages as dense breast tissue & implants both make detection much more difficult. Dense breasts can be naturally occurring or can be the result of physical activity. Women who are athletes and work heavily on their chest muscles, can develop denser breasts. An extreme example would be competitive women body builders who have very little body fat and an over abundance of hard muscle. Typically as women age they develop more breast fat and of course during pregnancy the % of breast fat also increases.
Click to expand...
Damn bro you should have spoken up earlier!

I happen to know about breast cancer quite a bit due to career, but unfortunately not a doctor and don't know non-cancer breasts so much. Oh one more complementary point: on average Asian tits have lower fat % (more connective tissue, therefore firmer, on average, then some size white women). The point about doctor performing physical exam (much more systematic than porno breast play) not able to detect real vs fake should finally settle the debate.

All we can do is speculate and give subjective Like or Unlike, unless someone can find X-ray and ultrasound scan. Which brings me back to my original position, I like to rank breasts according to my likes, not according to real vs. fake. Looks real? That's all I care. Both Hitomi and Nene Yoshitaka look real enough, but not necessarily what I like.
 
striker01 said:
My favorite girl with natural breasts on the smaller side Yuria Ashina.
Click to expand...
Those may be "smaller side" for porn, but for Japanese general population, those are big big tits. So purely on statistical basis, I give her (or anyone with big beautiful tits) less than 50% confidence.

And than I look for a vid to check out (sadly no active torrent) and noticed this cover:
SORA-117.jpg
I would call that rather suspicious. HOWEVER, the clips that you posted are very excellent. So I go back to my same question, what does it matter? I only care that they don't misshapen during vigorous kneading and bouncy cowgirl. I don't care about their back history and I don't care about future issues. Speaking of which, I hardly hear about breast implants long term complications any more. Maybe it is totally a non-issue, not even for marriage.

So here is another scale, how much do I care about implants:
1. gravue: almost not at all I care about implant (Photoshop takes care of everything)
2. IV: a tiny little I care (still very hard to detect)
3. porn: a little care (only need to look good)
4. prostitute: somewhat care (now I get to squeeze with my own hands a few times)
5. girlfriend: quite care (they have to hold up for a few months of squeezing and bouncing)
6. wife: very much care (risk of long term complication, especially it may become embarrassing outside of our own privacy)
7. as mother of my kids: absolutely certain (admit it's a bit creepy to talk about, does a man with a busty wife want his daughters/granddaughters to have big tits?)
 
Some random thoughts.

Saki Okuda real.
Julia fake.
Nao Wakana fake.
Ami Yoshikawa fake.

I have heard nowadays you can graft fat to boobs now. Dunno if true or not. I didn't bother to research it.

But Japanese implants on average do look better than the telltale basketballs in the West.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinggeorge
darksider59 said:
View attachment 1628869 View attachment 1628870 View attachment 1628871 View attachment 1628872
Yes they are/were in an idol group, but the group is meant to be "girl next door" type of girls. All kind of body types (even if most of them tend to be slender, some are slighly more "chubby"), and no way they did surgery (no way a 16 y/o girl [at that time] would get a boobjob, the 3rd pic). And this is just a few of them.
Click to expand...
"GND" is just a marketing/messaging gimmick. It only meant the target audience want to think, not what the real "typical" girl you find next door. Even in America, (IIRC, the phrase was coined by Playboy in their early history when the audience began to tire of "glamour") it never actually mean the average girl, but a very pretty girl who make-up, dress and talk like a normal person, instead of a pop idol, princess, diva, glamour girl, or prostitute.

About surgery, absolutely I believe the majority of *KB48 girls had at least one surgery done, perhaps boobs are not high priority areas for every *KB girls, but there's no reason at all to rule it out for any 16 years (or younger) girl in a pop idol group. Especially for Asian. Asian boob size is not that much smaller than white people. But (my pet theory) Asian boobs develop later. So if you take average boob size at 25, it's not a huge difference between Asians and whites. But if you take the average at 16 years old, the difference is huge.

J-pop is a cut throat business, a girl (or boy) lasting more than 1 year is already pretty lucky. Bikini gravue is one way to stand out amongst 48 (times N) group-mates. If indeed new technology is relatively safe and hard to detect, it would be naive to believe.

The reason I believe Aimi and not the HKT48 girl is not that I believe 16 year old JAV girl more than 16 year old J-pop girl. The reason is Aimi's boobs have been squeezed and bounced and swung literally thousands of times and I watch them 10 thousand times, and I haven't detected misshapening so I bet on the "real" side. So I tend to believe Aimi is that freak of nature one-in-a-million naturally busty early development (IIRC she said her boobs went bust when she was about 15) Japanese women. But busty J-pop girls, it's very rare to see them exposed, at least the bottom part of the boobs (see back to this post of a suspicious pix) and never a video clip of squeezing and bouncing. So I bet on the fake side. In both cases I can't be sure, of course. Aimi might be fake (perhaps she was fucking older guys for money when she was 15-16 and got herself a boob job and joined JAV at 18 years old) and HKT48 was real, perhaps, it's a possibility. But if we were betting money now, I have to make best guess based on available data.

And your response to @holyabdul why facepalm? I disagree with him for Julia and Aimi, probably Nao too... but Why get so invested in it. Everyone has his opinion and I see no point to declare my agree/disagree every single time.
 
Touka Rinne hast perfect natural breasts
 

Attachments

  • ssni00140pl.jpg
    ssni00140pl.jpg
    133.9 KB · Views: 157
  • ssni163pl-265x374.jpg
    ssni163pl-265x374.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 201
earljames said:
Mmh, I'm pretty sure they are natural, but of course not 100%.
However, I'm not really seeing any evidence for implants in the pictures you posted.
Maybe you could post some more pictures so I could reevaluate.
Click to expand...
No, the pix I posted are not "evidence", it's subjective. I look at them and "hmm... look suspicious", others look at them and "hmm... don't look suspicious". If (and when) I get around to download that vid (GVG-815) I would form a stronger opinion (one way or the other). In the meantime, feel free to (re)-watch the scene or other scenes involving "breast physics" (for those into Japanese sexy games like DOAX) and tell us your opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom