Thats how that guy from that one blog does it.Quite frankly, having to share my login/pass would be a deal breaker for me if I had one.
What kind of account are we referring to ?I know and I also wouldn't give it to the guy from the blog.
But as I said, that's me and I wouldn't buy that kind of account anyway since the quality of the videos is not good enough in my opinion.
In case that helps anyone, it's possible to change password and remove/change most of personal information in the account before sharing it.
As for quality, I agree - on dmm it could be far better with that bitrate they provide. I suggest to only buy full-hd videos (they are >4gb usually), at least they look better than any dvd-rip.
There reason that is, if you remove DRM from videos on DMM, you would be able to seek through them in your MPC-HC.Just finished up with genl to remove the DRM from my R18 files. His method worked and everything seems to be on the up-and-up. Only problem was I couldn't seek the wmv files in MPC-HC but worked fine in Windows Media Player and VLC, but after re-indexing them by remuxing with SolveigMM Video Splitter they played back perfectly. So just putting it out there if anyone is wary.
Point being is.Files from r18 = files from dmm, they don't have anything extra, just different encryption/decryption keys.
Seeking problem is trivial for protected files, and there are codecs that can properly seek through them without re-indexing (e.g. LAV filters work fine for me).
I will also be sending a re-indexing tool (asfbin) along with better decryption batch script, so the process for file owner is fully automated now.
Wrong, as far as I'm aware. They are same and will have same seeking problem when dealt with the same way.But when you remove DRM from one obtain on R18, you get a seeking problem if trying to play in player like MPC-HC
I disagree. People should use video players they like. And 3rd party video players and codecs can work well with wmv.Plus, wmv files should always be played in the the dedicated player meant for them.
Wrong, I have confirmed this with someone who does this as well.Wrong, as far as I'm aware. They are same and will have same seeking problem when dealt with the same way.
Yeah, people can use whatever they want, but the best for FHD wmv is the dedicated player made for that type of file.I disagree. People should use video players they like. And 3rd party video players and codecs can work well with wmv.
It would be less troublesome to use the dedicated player made for that file, but you won't get the best quality that way.Yeah, people can use whatever they want, but the best for FHD wmv is the dedicated player made for that type of file.
Essentially even the player combined with the codec is the best for wmv files. Especially with files that were undrm from R18 because playing in there gives you no seeking issue. You can seek to your hearts content. And furthermore, the seeking from R18 videos is way faster than ones from DMM. Its weird.It would be less troublesome to use the dedicated player made for that file, but you won't get the best quality that way.
With the many open source video related projects out there, you can fine tune many option to get the best quality for your eyes since different people are affected differently by some artifacts produced by different steps during video decoding.
If you're using a player that supports the madvr renderer, it doesn't take shortcuts like every other renderers out there so it's already better than any dedicated video player out there.
And in the case of windows media player, it's a directshow player so you can use the exact same codecs in any other directshow based video player like mpchc and the likes(not VLC or mplayer though).
As for the seeking problem, R18.com may be using a different version of the wmv container that's slightly different and the decryption tool wasn't made for it so it's screwing up the container somehow which a re-muxing will fix without any trouble.
It's only a theory though since I don't know the inner workings of any of them.
Different decoders have different workarounds for some commons problems(not all tools produce up to spec containers) so some people might not even notice there's a seeking problem while others might, depending on what they use to play the files.
I will try to upload one for you later on. And pm you the link.Do you have an example of an R18 video available somewhere(for a free user) where the seeking doesn't work? I'd be curious to test that theory.
Also, it's not just about tweaking things that makes other players a better choice.
Using madvr as an example, it does all of it's calculations with high numbers to decrease the amount of rounding that occurs in every calculations so the image will look truer to what was intended. For example, pretty much every commercially available video need to have the colors resized on playback to fit with the actual image so if you round up too much, the colors may not be aligned quite properly in the end.
It also does other technical stuff that always happen for every single video in much better ways(at the price of requiring a more powerful pc).
Re-muxing is taking what's inside the container(usually the video and audio track) and putting it inside another container(could simply be another wmv container for a wmv file). There's no quality loss whatsoever since the actual video and audio aren't touched.