Are you a visual type... or not?

[kharo88]

This is one of those times when I don't know how to put my thoughts into words, so I'll just give you an example of what I mean, and hopefully everyone will get it! I made some gifs to illustrate my point. Here's the first one:

As you can see, this is just a handjob, but I still like it very much. Why? Because I find the actress' face attractive, I like that I can see her nice legs, I'm a huge fan of her outfit and the cumshot is pretty nice, too.

Now let's take a look at this gif:

In this case, the actress makes the guy cum in her mouth, yet, I don't find it nearly as appealing as the handjob above.

If I had to choose which one of the two I'd like to be performed on me, I'd go with the second one, because that would feel better, but as someone who can only watch, I'd definitely go with the handjob, because I find it visually much more stimulating.

And I think that's what JAV makers should aim for. When watching JAV, I'm much more turned on by something that looks great on film than something that would feel great if it were done to me, because, again, I'm just watching, and not feeling it.

There is, of course, the golden mean, those instances where it looks great and must feel great for the actor, but let's forget about those for a moment. If it's just one or the other, which one do you prefer?

 

[Inertia]

They're catering to people with different kinds of fetishes: the first is for someone who gets off on femdom titles that focus a lot on legs and feet. The other's for the POV blowjob crowd.

 

[kharo88]

They're catering to people with different kinds of fetishes: the first is for someone who gets off on femdom titles that focus a lot on legs and feet. The other's for the POV blowjob crowd.

Yeah, I get that, but that's not my point. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but the thing is, I don't know how I could make it clearer. :/

 

[paparoach408]

And I think that's what JAV makers should aim for. When watching JAV, I'm much more turned on by something that looks great on film than something that would feel great if it were done to me, because, again, I'm just watching, and not feeling it.

If the industry tried to only please one market then there would be a lot of unhappy customers. That's why there are so many different fetishes, you want one thing and others want something else and everyone is happy(besides the complaints of a girl not doing what you want to see )

and on the question, all i care about is if it looks great, since the majority of the reactions kind of hard for me to visualize it as feeling great

 

[periph]

i depends on the mindset of the viewer: are you putting yourself in the place of an observer watching something arousing? or imaging yourself in the place of the one in the video?

Probably most do both at one time or another.

 

[Casshern2]

I am definitely a Visual viewer. Perfect example: I wish more (if not ALL) JAV studios would keep the heels on the stars during sex. That is just 110% more visually simulating to me. Small socks are okay, they make legs look cute, but heels make them look sexy. And we're talking about Visual or Not Visual, in case someone wants to bring up the point of it not being practical to keep heels on. Of course it isn't, but it creates the visual.

 

[Supmop]

I'm definitely a visual type, if not I prefer to read erotic novels than watching porn movies right ?

back to your topic, I think I understand what you mean, sometimes I prefer to watch some regular girls doing orgy than very pretty girl doing casual 1 vs 1 sex

 

[ding73ding]

Well duh, isn't it self evident? AV: brightly lit, real sex: dim light. AV: fit girl, real sex: chubby girl. AV: separation of the male and female bodies so both camera and lighting can access the "action organs", real sex: almost total contact between the male and female bodies because it feels great. AV: long slow strokes, real sex: short quick strokes. Because pulling more than 1/3 of the cock length out the orifice is great for the camera but doesn't feel great for either male or female. AV: warm dry environment so both bodies can be fully exposed to show the camera but the dude doesn't get cold shrunken cock. Real sex: cool dry environment and cuddle inside the sheets. AV: paizuri, Real sex: forgettboutit. AV: cum on face, chest or butt, real sex: internal mouth pussy or anal.

Making porn isn't a documentary of real and/or good sex. Fantastic sex is boring on screen.

 

[jchouktv]

May I ask what the source movie on the second GIF is please?

 

[kharo88]

May I ask what the source movie on the second GIF is please?

Sure thing, it's SUPD-128. That part is around 16 minutes if I remember correctly.

 

[vincent_z]

This hits the target of what I like about erotica (not just JAVs).
Are you a spectator to what is going on in the JAV, or are you a distant participant?
If you're the former, you probably preferred the 1st clip in which our female sucked off the male.
If you're the latter, you enjoyed the 2nd clip because the male in that scene got to plunge his cock into the JAV female's pussy. You identified with that male. IE: It wasn't an anonymous (or semi-anonymous) male having sex with that female, it was you. From that moment, you were our performing male. If he didn't perform the actions you would have done; or more critically, did not produce as substantial a money shot as did you watching back here on your computer, it was not a good video.
Ultimately, this is what this thread asks. I enjoy lots of JAVs. I also enjoy lots of off-topic 'vintage' pr0n from the U.S.A. and Europe.

 

[ding73ding]

Yes that's a nice way to articulate the point. I am definitely a visual type, a spectator. That's why I hate POV vids.

I have a pet theory that POV vids are made for cherry boys, who don't have sex with a real person regularly, or even ever. When you have a decent sex life, you know it's a whole different experience than fapping to JAV. Then you would not expect the JAV to replace the real sex. For cherry boys and otakus, they don't have real sex, so JAV is a replacement. They are the distant participant. For me, I have a pretty good sex life, so JAV is not replacement, it's supplement.

 

[Supmop]

I have a pet theory that POV vids are made for cherry boys, who don't have sex with a real person regularly, or even ever. When you have a decent sex life, you know it's a whole different experience than fapping to JAV. Then you would not expect the JAV to replace the real sex. For cherry boys and otakus, they don't have real sex, so JAV is a replacement. They are the distant participant. For me, I have a pretty good sex life, so JAV is not replacement, it's supplement.

agree with that