did 2 vr titles for SOD... then nothing with madonna despite being with them a long time
where can one buy this ?First VR of Ai Nozose, she is perfect if you like the girlfriend experience. Awesome face-to-face scenes:
3DSVR-1254
View attachment 3212211
View attachment 3212212
View attachment 3212213
what is with big tits and oil????????????? i hate it so much.. sure every now and then is fine.. but almost every hana haruna title she is oiled up... and every time i see a new big tits actress i just check the thumbnails.. sure enough .. scene 1 ..oil.. scene 2 oil... etcSOD is releasing a lot of VRs this year, but very mediocre ones. Short, overdressed, boring, and nothing remarkable.
Last year they released a series called VR Channel for their exclusive SOD Stars girls, and the first one, VR Channel 001 with the wonderful Nishimoto Meisa, is one of the best VRs ever: 3 hours long, all kinds of positions and situations... a masterpiece:
More than a year later, today they have release VR Channel 002, with another exclusive girl, Momona Koibuchi.
View attachment 3232384
It is the same style as the previous one: three hours long, many situations, etc. But in my opinion, much more mediocre to the point that I will not buy it at A Festa VR.
It has everything I don't like about JAV VR: Oil, the bunny girl nonsense, bathroom sex, lots of touching and toys but very little sex, and above all, no face-to-face missionary.
Even the great director Yazawa Receives has dropped in level this year.... A real pity, because we probably won't see a VR Channel 003 again until next year...
where can one buy this ?
Exactly what I think. All curvy girls get oiled. Almost 100% of the sex scenes in all VR movies. It's something I don't understand, and I hate it.what is with big tits and oil????????????? i hate it so much.. sure every now and then is fine.. but almost every hana haruna title she is oiled up... and every time i see a new big tits actress i just check the thumbnails.. sure enough .. scene 1 ..oil.. scene 2 oil... etc
i like the marina VR ..but only because it was her and i had waited so long for it.. but again... scene 3 was the only decent sex scene and she was oiledExactly what I think. All curvy girls get oiled. Almost 100% of the sex scenes in all VR movies. It's something I don't understand, and I hate it.
Once in a while, okay. But always?
Did you like the VR with Marina Shiraishi, Chryptic?
Yes I think the same. Scene 3 is the only decent one, but oiled... And no missionary, I don't understand...i like the marina VR ..but only because it was her and i had waited so long for it.. but again... scene 3 was the only decent sex scene and she was oiled
The logical step is to move onto 3D, it seems. Dabbled in gravure briefly, then moved onto 2D JAV - the final destination is 3D.From what you tell you are the perfect candidate to get into VR. A world without ugly or noisy guys where YOU are the person who is with the girls, and not someone else. In VR they take great care that the guy is not noisy, and is seen as little as possible. It is inevitable to see a little bit of the hands and legs, but in a few days they become invisible to your brain.
Have never tried VR before, no. VR JAV will be my introduction to the platform - very excited.I don't know if you have ever tried VR, but there are two very important differences with respect to 2D POV. The first is that you see the girls in 3D, and that makes your brain feel them more real, and more exciting.
But above all, what struck me the most because I didn't expect it, is that you see the girls in real size, and a few centimeters away from you. And that's an incredible rush, you really have the feeling that they are there with you. That they are talking to you and you are making love to them.
That is the dream, haha. I'm very much a quality over quantity man. My 2D JAV collection has already dwindled to the point where only a few titles remain - that will hold me until I plunge into VR. Looking at what VR offers and what 2D offers is a little jarring - 2D looks archaic now, though still somewhat effective. Been watching 2D for three years - you've been living the high life in the meantime, haha.For me the difference is so big that 2D porn no longer appeals to me, I've only been watching VR porn for 3 years now. 2D porn is like the old porn magazines with pictures, they are outdated.
VR definitely has utility. I believe that you use the Samsung Odyssey Plus - discontinued, so would have to scour the used market. Not picky - whichever I can get my hands on, whichever has the lowest barrier to entry. Will most likely be the Quest. Lead a frugal lifestyle, so the purchase will not be rash.The day after tomorrow the Quest 3 will be presented, wait to see what they cost, and when they come out, and you decide. For me VR goggles are the best money I have ever spent on entertainment.
Now 11 titles:What are the VR titles do you have?
Have never tried VR before, no. VR JAV will be my introduction to the platform - very excited.
In 2D JAV there are many positions I dislike. I lean more toward acts like cowgirl as they are high-impact positions that I find arousing - all focus on the woman, unless the guy is moaning loudly
If you haven't tried virtual reality, then your head will explode..... Seeing the girls life-size and in 3D, just a few centimeters away from you, changes everything. You can move your head inside the video and look where you want, it's not a fixed camera. Your brain feels them next to you, it changes the perception of sex completely. It's much more exciting than watching a flat screen movie with girls the size of a few centimeters.
Yes! That is what I desire, haha. I have a vague idea of what VR may feel like, but I'm still having a little trouble truly visualising the experience. The girls are still relatively distant when watching the VR video without a headset - to think that they'll be so very close to me makes my heart beat just that much faster. I have no qualms leaving behind 2D for good - VR releases aren't as frequent (I believe a stat in this thread was something like 2,000 releases a year compared to <10,000 releases for regular JAV. Quality over quantity, however. Not as overwhelming). Have you completely left the world of 2D?And this happens to a lot of people, when the girl kisses you and start to talk at the same time, it's so real that sometimes your brain feels like she's breathing on your face. You really feel the breath. It's an incredible thing.
I went through the thread a week ago which is where I found a couple titles to start off with. I'll have to go back to read it more in-depth. It's really that immersive? Haha! Incredible. Ooh, I can imagine the issues that could arise with a partner. 2D porn is one thing - 3D is a step that most do not take; very personal, intimate.There are people, and I'm serious, who feel guilty when watching VR porn, because it feels like they are cheating on their partner, because it feels so real. We have discussed it in this thread,
Seeing as my laptop is not the most powerful (i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz, 16GB Ram, Intel Iris XE) and many VR videos I have played have noticeable frame lag, it would be best to get a Quest and take advantage of the device's large storage (the larger the better) and use it wirelessly. That is my understanding, at this point in time. The Oculus does have the option of wires though - I assume you can use it both tethered and wireless if you wish? I'll do further research. If just wireless, I assume that the power of the device is more than enough to run the videos smoothly.About the glasses, yes, I have an old Oddysey Plus glasses, which are no longer sold. I prefer PC glasses because you can add all the supersampling you want to improve the definition, depending on the power of the graphics card. It looks a little sharper than with the Quest 2. But it's true that for porn the Quest are more comfortable, because they don't have cables.
The compact form factor is appealing with the 3rd iteration. Also uses pancake lenses, though still unfamiliar with the tech in VR. Either 2 or 3 - I won't be upset either way. Whichever I can get my hands on.The Quest 3 will be announced on June 1st, but it seems that they will be a bit more expensive than the Quest 2, although smaller and with better image quality. The Quest 2s are good to start with, and when the Quest 3s are released, you will see a lot of cheap second hand Quest 2s.
I'm expecting it to be rather overwhelming . I will start of with harems (with a particular cast) and see how things develop.There are some good titles on that list you posted. I see you like trios and harems. I'm more of a single girl. So many people together is distracting....
I am here to stay. I've lurked for long enough.I hope you can buy some glasses soon, and tell us about your experience.
That happened to me, I had seen VR on a flat screen and thought that with glasses it would be the same, but with some screens on the eyes. But it's completely different. As I say, what left me in shock is to see the girls in real size, and much closer than what you see in VR videos on a flat screen.Yes! That is what I desire, haha. I have a vague idea of what VR may feel like, but I'm still having a little trouble truly visualising the experience. The girls are still relatively distant when watching the VR video without a headset - to think that they'll be so very close to me makes my heart beat just that much faster.
Well, I think the comments are a bit of a joke, because it's still a fantasy with a video. Very real, but a fantasy. But sometimes you think about it, because you are watching a scene in the missionary position with the girl looking you in the eyes and you have her in front of you a few centimeters away, life-size and in 3D, you feel her so real, that it does seem that you are cheating on your partner....It's really that immersive? Haha! Incredible. Ooh, I can imagine the issues that could arise with a partner.
Yes, it is not powerful enough to add supersampling to a 4K or 8K video. You should use the Quest or Pico 4. They have less sharpness than PC VR with supersampling, but it is OK.Seeing as my laptop is not the most powerful (i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz, 16GB Ram, Intel Iris XE) and many VR videos
The compact form factor is appealing with the 3rd iteration. Also uses pancake lenses, though still unfamiliar with the tech in VR. Either 2 or 3 - I won't be upset either way. Whichever I can get my hands on.
This will definitely allow me to explore more vanilla scenes that didn't do much for me in 2D. Fantastic. My collection will surely increase once I have experience.That happened to me, I had seen VR on a flat screen and thought that with glasses it would be the same, but with some screens on the eyes. But it's completely different. As I say, what left me in shock is to see the girls in real size, and much closer than what you see in VR videos on a flat screen.
It's the same distance as in real life, when you're with a girl. If she's kissing you, she's right next to you, or in a face-to-face scene like a cowgirl or a missionary, she's inches away from you... This is something impossible to experience on a 2D screen.
Haha. I definitely have a couple favourites - did feel a little jealous when they'd perform with a certain Japanese actor. Want them all for myself!Well, I think the comments are a bit of a joke, because it's still a fantasy with a video. Very real, but a fantasy. But sometimes you think about it, because you are watching a scene in the missionary position with the girl looking you in the eyes and you have her in front of you a few centimeters away, life-size and in 3D, you feel her so real, that it does seem that you are cheating on your partner....
On a personal level, it has changed my relationship with the actresses. Before VR I didn't know the name of any of them, they were just girls who do porn. But in VR they talk to you, they caress you, they kiss you, and you start to see them as real people. You want to know what their names are because you care about them. And, this is true, it also happens to more people and we've discussed it here, you feel a bit of jealousy and discomfort when you see them in other 2D movies with other guys...
I haven't watched some 2D movies with some of my favorite actresses because it makes me angry to see them with another guy instead of with me in VR, that's 100% true....
As I suspected. Good to know.Yes, it is not poweful enough. You should use the Quest or Pico 4.
Got it. The Quest 2 has max 256GB - the Quest 3 (speculated) 256GB-512GB. My laptop has enough storage, so I can swap out videos whenever I desire. No issue. I will always prefer the economical option, and am conscious of ROI. If the improvements for the Quest 3 are marginal compared to the price, I'll opt for the 2. Raring to go.Quest 3 will be smaller, that's a plus. Pancake lenses do not affect video, only 3D gaming. But they will have more screen resolution. They will be better than Quest 2, but also more expensive. Video only, you may be better off with Quest 2, depending on the price difference.
You can use cable or wireless mode but that's only when you connect them to a PC. To watch movies in VR they work with the processor and memory of the glasses themselves, no cable is needed.
I am not sure if they will announce the Quest 3, as its just Metas Gaming Showcase. They might teaser it though.The Quest 3 will be announced on June 1st, but it seems that they will be a bit more expensive than the Quest 2, although smaller and with better image quality. The Quest 2s are good to start with, and when the Quest 3s are released, you will see a lot of cheap second hand Quest 2s.
With the Quest devices using a player on the device is the way to go as streaming from the PC (whether wireless or wired) does have compression.Seeing as my laptop is not the most powerful (i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz, 16GB Ram, Intel Iris XE) and many VR videos I have played have noticeable frame lag, it would be best to get a Quest and take advantage of the device's large storage (the larger the better) and use it wirelessly. That is my understanding, at this point in time. The Oculus does have the option of wires though - I assume you can use it both tethered and wireless if you wish? I'll do further research. If just wireless, I assume that the power of the device is more than enough to run the videos smoothly.
Actually my suggestion would be to go with the cheapest (smallest storage) model. While it may sound like a good idea to play the files directly from the device, most people don't do that for two reasons:Got it. The Quest 2 has max 256GB - the Quest 3 (speculated) 256GB-512GB. My laptop has enough storage, so I can swap out videos whenever I desire. No issue. I will always prefer the economical option, and am conscious of ROI. If the improvements for the Quest 3 are marginal compared to the price, I'll opt for the 2. Raring to go.
VR porn is a great experience for sure and especially JAV VR is so much ahead compared to western VR porn, but unfortunately the relatively low resolution is an issue. You might think that 4k is more than sharp enough, but keep in mind that you are watching the video with the display only centimeters in front of your eyes, to the image will a lot less sharp than what you see on your computer screen. So many times I was excited with a video and it looked great on the computer, but when watching it on the VR headset the image quality destroyed that experience (unfortunately NHVR often got terrible visual quality).I'm expecting it to be rather overwhelming . I will start of with harems (with a particular cast) and see how things develop.
I disagree on the statement that Pancake lenses do not have any effect on VR video.Quest 3 will be smaller, that's a plus. Pancake lenses do not affect video, only 3D gaming. But they will have more screen resolution. They will be better than Quest 2, but also more expensive. Video only, you may be better off with Quest 2, depending on the price difference.
Well, I don't think it has anything to do with the fact that they are pancake lenses, but rather that they are better lenses... The FOV does improve, but Quest 2 has little FOV, my old Odyssey Plus glasses have more FOV than Quest 2 and Pico 4, and they are not Pancake.Sweetspot and image clarity are much better and the perceived FOV is higher as your face is closer to the lenses
but unfortunately the relatively low resolution is an issue