For me its two aspects:This comment surprises me. I've never owned a Quest 2, but with Odyssey Plus which even have a little less resolution than Quest 2, on PC with a RTX 3070Ti graphics card using HereSphere with MSAA supersampling at 2X, Steam VR with 200% resolution, I see the VRs at 4K almost like a Blu-ray, and the 8K, equal or better than a Bluray. I see them perfectly sharp (except those with poor image quality, of course). I've even defined some 8K titles as "real life resolution", because I see them almost like real life...
I don't see VRs blurry or with poor sharpness, I'm surprised by your comment...
Hmm... That's not my feeling... On the contrary, I see the colors of the skins more natural, in many movies in 4K they sometimes looked too reddish or orange...While clarity is good, colors and skin do look flat somehow.
I don't understand this criticism of the Japanese. The "too real is bad" is nonsense.. Of course, the more definition you have, the more you can see the irregularities of the skin. As it should be. They are real women, not dolls.In some japanese blogs it has been mentioned that too much detail could also have a negative effect and i think i understand that now. The image is more clear, so skin irritations are more visible. That little blurryness in 4k is a lot more forgiving in that matter.
I think you are right about the colors being more skin-like. 4k JAV almost always had some kind of reddish coloring to it, so i have saturation just for red reduced by 10-15%. I think i got used to that coloring. In comparison the 8k videos do feel more realistic but somehow not so livid. But i think its just a matter of time that i will get used to it.Hmm... That's not my feeling... On the contrary, I see the colors of the skins more natural, in many movies in 4K they sometimes looked too reddish or orange...
I agree to at least to some degree: not having perfect skin adds realism and is a good thing, but i still hope that studios adapt a little bit to it (i think it was in MDVR-239 that there a lot of pimples visible on the male actor and in the genital area of the girl.) Its something that is just more noticable and just need to be considered in the make-up. For far cameras were just not sharp enough to make things like that visible.I don't understand this criticism of the Japanese. The "too real is bad" is nonsense.. Of course, the more definition you have, the more you can see the irregularities of the skin. As it should be. They are real women, not dolls.
But that's not a defect, it's real life. If those Japanese blogs don't like it, then use the 4K version. But what can't be asked is that the studios make the 8K version more blurred to hide the flaws in the girls' skin...
I fully understand if they will not go the same way as CzechVR (80Mbit+) as it would make content not streamable anymore, but going down to 10Mbit (while 4k videos have 30Mbit quite often), is a bit extreme.As for what you say about the bitrate, it is true that it is quite low. It's a bit noticeable in the black and red backgrounds, which pixelate a bit. Let's hope they improve this issue.
I've been very happy with these first 8K movies, it's a very important improvement. Now the hard part is to go back to 4K videos...
Most of the Resorevo videos (including the one you mentioned) were produced by Quatchy (https://www.dmm.co.jp/digital/video...ice=vr/id=111209/limit=120/sort=release_date/) . Most of his work is for Koala VR (KIWVR), SOD and KMPVR. I know that he is quite popular and scored pretty well on sugoi-VR awards.Of this first batch of 8K videos, for me the best are the Moodz ones, with varied scenes and top-down missionary (where you are face to face and see the whole body, and the penetration).
The S1 ones are also very good. The IP VR ones lack the aforementioned top-dow missionary, just like the Resorevo titles.
I don't know who makes this label, Resorevo, but I'm pretty sure it's KMP. It has their boring setup and slow-sex style where the girls barely move.
For example in RSVR-002 with Ichika Matsumoto, there is a good seduction scene and a good face-to-face cowgirl, but you don't see her back o butt in all movie, no reverse cowgirl or doggy.... And the missionary, from far away. Too lazy and boring, for me, it's KMP or a team working for them.
They made a mistake in their promo pic for her name and changed it.SIVR-260
My fav, she's back, but under a different name: Hoshi Maria
Too bad there's no "ground specialization" camera angle in this, so disappointing, her old ones are still the best. SIVR-172 almost killed me.
Am I stupid, or it's the same? They spelled 'Maria' wrong(the Japanese name is still Hoshi Maria on the pic), but that's it? Sorry, I don't get it. Her previous name was Amane Mahina.They made a mistake in their promo pic for her name and changed it.
They used her old name in Kanji and changed into new name in Kanji, time to play spot the difference in the pics.Am I stupid, or it's the same? They spelled 'Maria' wrong(the Japanese name is still Hoshi Maria on the pic), but that's it? Sorry, I don't get it. Her previous name was Amane Mahina.
She is great, but I don't like her last title. Too much clothes for my tastes, and camera far away. I am not sure what is "ground specialization camera angle", but if it is face-to-face missionary where you see the full body of the girl and the penetration, yes, it should be mandatory in all the movies...oo bad there's no "ground specialization" camera angle in this, so disappointing, her old ones are still the best. SIVR-172 almost killed me.
Ah damn it, I was only looking at the bottom left. Honestly I like her previous name more, plus it's more unique when searching, this new name sadly won't doing her any good.They used her old name in Kanji and changed into new name in Kanji, time to play spot the difference in the pics.
Yep, remember we had a 'discussion' about different types of face to face camera angles few months ago? I was saying I want the camera to be over/above the head of the actress, and I don't think I got you to understand what I meant. If you don't mind me trying once more...She is great, but I don't like her last title. Too much clothes for my tastes, and camera far away. I am not sure what is "ground specialization camera angle", but if it is face-to-face missionary where you see the full body of the girl and the penetration, yes, it should be mandatory in all the movies...