There's always a lesbian on porn boards claiming to speak for all lesbians. That said, you misrepresent LADY's early output. They did the occasional orgy title, like all publishers have. It isn't as if it was every month. They started out releasing two, then three at the most, titles per month (two release weeks per month). I would suggest that you look back then rethink your statement. And don't simply look at the cover, see five cast members and assume it's a five girl orgy on offer.
I also think that you have the history a little skewed. The period that I referred to was just 10 years ago. That was NOT the prevailing view at all then, that g/g was sick and twisted (I love it when ppl basically read my own FAQ back to me). That was 30 plus years ago, before Chie Sugawara (google her), before the popularity of lesbian kiss fetish (pioneered by FA Pro, btw)
I would suggest that all who are interested go back and trawl through the archived boards at lezcom and such and read up on the views from the hardcore Japanese g/g fans. The view that you lot have of FA pro is just completely the opposite of the prevailing view of those fans, people who have been watching this stuff way longer than I have.
It is one thing to have an opinion and another to be factually incorrect.
I also think that you have the history a little skewed. The period that I referred to was just 10 years ago. That was NOT the prevailing view at all then, that g/g was sick and twisted (I love it when ppl basically read my own FAQ back to me). That was 30 plus years ago, before Chie Sugawara (google her), before the popularity of lesbian kiss fetish (pioneered by FA Pro, btw)
I would suggest that all who are interested go back and trawl through the archived boards at lezcom and such and read up on the views from the hardcore Japanese g/g fans. The view that you lot have of FA pro is just completely the opposite of the prevailing view of those fans, people who have been watching this stuff way longer than I have.
It is one thing to have an opinion and another to be factually incorrect.