You have summarized everything perfectly, I don't have much to contribute. My criticism is that the introduction lasts forever, and as you say the sex is only 20 minutes, and the sex positions only last 3 minutes. I miss more kisses, more interaction of the actress, and a little more passion and realism. I love the introductions, they give sense and excitement to the movies, but not at the cost of cutting the sex scenes, because they want to cram everything into 60 minutes.
The problem here is the director, because we must not forget that it is a debut in VR, and she probably has no idea what to do. In VR there is a very high percentage of movies with newcomers, because incomprehensibly many actresses only shoot one VR, and we never see them again. And in most of these debuts it seems that the actresses are left to their own, because they don't know what to do, or they don't do anything at all, hence the boring and mechanical sex.
Exactly, that prehistoric missionary is coming back. That ties into the thread of my complaints that VR is being shot from further and further away.
When I watched western VR and subscribed to SexLikeReal, some years ago, Alex Nash shot the most immersive VRs (he's the only one who knows how to shoot VR outside Japan). And when he placed the camera up close on missionaries or kissing, people complained that the camera was too close and they couldn't see anything. They have no idea what VR is.
My theory is that as VR has become more mainstream, filled with casual users who use the headset once a month and they don't understand what VR is,, they demand VR to be the same as 2D flat porn. When the camera is close as they're not used to VR, they complain. And the same thing is happening now in Japan.
That's why the camera is getting further and further away, that's why VR is less and less “feel” and more and more just look, and that's why it's getting more like 2D porn with guys on screen, and with extreme and weird movies. It is becoming less “real” and less “virtual”. It devolves to the old 3D TVs.
I hope I am wrong and you are absolutely right.
The problem here is the director, because we must not forget that it is a debut in VR, and she probably has no idea what to do. In VR there is a very high percentage of movies with newcomers, because incomprehensibly many actresses only shoot one VR, and we never see them again. And in most of these debuts it seems that the actresses are left to their own, because they don't know what to do, or they don't do anything at all, hence the boring and mechanical sex.
Exactly, that prehistoric missionary is coming back. That ties into the thread of my complaints that VR is being shot from further and further away.
When I watched western VR and subscribed to SexLikeReal, some years ago, Alex Nash shot the most immersive VRs (he's the only one who knows how to shoot VR outside Japan). And when he placed the camera up close on missionaries or kissing, people complained that the camera was too close and they couldn't see anything. They have no idea what VR is.
My theory is that as VR has become more mainstream, filled with casual users who use the headset once a month and they don't understand what VR is,, they demand VR to be the same as 2D flat porn. When the camera is close as they're not used to VR, they complain. And the same thing is happening now in Japan.
That's why the camera is getting further and further away, that's why VR is less and less “feel” and more and more just look, and that's why it's getting more like 2D porn with guys on screen, and with extreme and weird movies. It is becoming less “real” and less “virtual”. It devolves to the old 3D TVs.
I hope I am wrong and you are absolutely right.
Last edited:
